HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Selection of recompression recontact booster~

2017-01-01 View Original

Thread Content

For the booster pumps in our company’s reprocessing system, back-pressure steam turbines are being used, with pressures ranging from 0.3 to 0.5 to 1.6 Mpa. I wonder if it would be more appropriate to use reciprocating compressors instead The advantage of a centrifugal compressor is its large exhaust volume and continuous airflow, although its efficiency is lower than that of a reciprocating compressor. What is the maximum compression ratio that a turbocentrifugal compressor can achieve?
Reply #2 2017-01-01
It depends on the hydrogen production volume; a reciprocating machine is suitable for lower volumes, while a centrifuge is better for higher volumes. There are also many problems with reciprocating machines. As for the compression ratio, it generally does not exceed 3 per stage, with values around 2.2–2.5 being more common.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.