dehydrogenation

2017-01-21 View Original

Thread Content

Which company is better for C3 dehydrogenation processes?

Reply #2 2017-01-21

UOP’s Oleflex process and the Rumus process are two options that can be evaluated; currently, UOP’s process packages are those that are most commonly used

Reply #3 2017-01-25

UOP’s propane and C4 dehydrogenation technologies are quite good.

Reply #4 2017-02-09

In China, the only systems that are in industrial operation are UOP and LUMMUS. Currently, the investment required for both is roughly the same, but in terms of operational stability, LUMMUS is far more stable. As far as I know, Satellite Petrochemical and the first phase of Donghua Energy used UOP technology, but they now plan to switch to the Rumus process.

Reply #5 2017-02-13

For UOP, we just focus on UOP – we’ve done comparisons and things like that.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

dehydrogenation

Thread Content

Submit a Project

Disclaimer

Quick Links