Thread Content
For an atmospheric-pressure vessel with an operating pressure of less than 0.1 MPa and a highly hazardous medium, are inspection, heat treatment, and test plates still considered as part of pressure vessels?
Whether to consider it as a pressure vessel or not is defined by the design pressure according to the standards
Should I follow the standards for atmospheric pressure vessels and manufacture it according to those standards? That’s what it means, right!
Failing to implement tolerance specifications does not mean ignoring safety factors. From a safety perspective, more thorough consideration should be given during design. Because the leakage of such a medium is unacceptable. Therefore, when designing, requirements should not be lowered just because a class is not used. Of course, if you think there’s no chance of leakage, you can also use normal pressure.
In accordance with the requirements of most design specifications for atmospheric pressure vessels, extremely and highly hazardous atmospheric pressure vessels should be designed in accordance with GB150; it is not necessary to classify them into certain categories, but for safety reasons, the standards must still be met!
This post was last edited by zjq1962 on 2018-1-19 08:56. Are there any scope limitations for the standards applicable to pressure vessels? Do they apply to media with extremely high hazards?
This is originally the exact wording from the citation standards
This is originally the exact wording from the citation standards
“Are there any range limitations for the standards of atmospheric pressure vessels, and are they applicable to media with extremely high hazards? ” That’s what you asked.