Which is better currently, Chuanyi’s or Shangyi’s instruments? Are they considered to be of the same tier?

Shangyi doesn’t understand. Our company uses Chuanyi flow meters and transmitters, and their quality is quite good.

The original poster should first find out what types of instruments each of Chuanyi and Shangyi produces, then check the corresponding technical specifications for each type of instrument, and finally make his own judgment. Also, first determine for yourself the specific criteria you consider to be good or bad for a gauge, and then make judgments based on those criteria. Is it regarding the price? Is it in terms of technical uniqueness? Is it regarding reliability? Is it in terms of market share? Is it in terms of easy procurement? Is it related to after-sales service? Or what amount of kickback should I give you? Or is it about having your friends or close buddies act as agents? Was it something related to offending your suppliers or sales staff? Or in terms of tolerating the level of debt? Is it the user causing trouble for no reason? ……………… There is no such thing as a good or bad chemical process instrument; the only consideration is whether it is suitable or not, and whether it is accepted by both the supplier and the buyer. Just like a person’s life, is it better to live in luxury with fine clothes and food, or to have simple meals? What do you think?

:Suppliers that are completely outperformed in every aspect will naturally be eliminated by the market. Being able to survive certainly gives advantages in certain aspects. Which one is better for single ambiguity? It really seems stupid

I often see posts on HaiChuan asking which instruments are good; if one doesn’t even have a clear idea of what constitutes a good standard, then it’s truly like having no seeds or insects to work with.

It must be Chuanyi; I’ve never heard of Shangyi. At least choose Tianyi.

I’ve learned it.* What suits one is good