HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

The SHELL unit at our company has stopped running again. . .

2011-06-30 View Original

Thread Content

It stopped operating after just 65 days. Can you, the 9.8 pipeline for air separation, be more reliable? Leaks occur constantly; we’ve only had it running for half a year. It stops working even due to power fluctuations, and there are also problems with the coal pipelines. Once again, it’s the air separation system that causes issues. Can’t you, the gasification unit, function properly? Since it started operation, it has stopped several times; none of those stops were related to you. The pressure in other workshops is very high. Please do something to help with the procurement of raw coal – when will we be able to receive coal with a calorific value of over 5500 on a per-ton basis? I wonder if we can achieve a record of more than 100 days of continuous operation this year :dizzy:
Reply #2 2011-06-30
Which factory’s Shell furnace is yours? It seems to be operating well. Could you tell me about the current problems with this Shell furnace as well as its operating parameters?
Reply #3 2011-07-01
65 days is not bad:$:sleepy:
Reply #4 2011-07-01
Switch to a space furnace; it has a longer operating time
Reply #5 2011-07-01
How long can the space furnace operate continuously, and what is the coal feeding rate?
Reply #6 2011-07-02
It performed well for 65 days; it’s a shame it had to stop running not due to any fault of its own
Reply #7 2011-07-02
On that day at your factory, you saw that Henan Kaixiang had been in operation for 102 days; the two of you should learn from each other*
Reply #8 2011-07-02
Reply to 5# gsphl: The aerospace furnace can operate for up to 150 days, with a coal feeding rate of 750 t/d or 1500 t/d
Reply #9 2011-07-02
There’s no comparison possible – they started operating in June 2008, while we began in November 2010. They are coal mining companies, whereas we collect coal from various sources; whether it’s from space furnaces, GE units, or GSP units. You can try to get a carbon content of around 5500, with an ash content that remains above 25% over time. The processing process is always determined by the type of medium used. By the way, after some calculations, they determined that it takes 66 days. . . Earlier, a classmate asked about the problems with Shell boilers as well as their operating parameters. All I can tell you is that these operating parameters are kept confidential. Our biggest issue is the lack of high-quality coal; the designed value is 6200, but in reality it’s 5500. If Shell boilers are to be operated properly, you should go and learn from Liuhua and Shuanghuan
Reply #10 2011-07-02
Reply to 9# Soy Sauce User: Isn’t Shell said to be suitable for all types of coal?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.