Engineering document naming convention

2009-12-31 View Original

Thread Content

It has been found that different organizations use varying naming conventions for engineering documents. Is there any mandatory standard for naming such documents? This is especially true regarding the naming rules for documents related to pressure pipelines and pressure vessels. For example: A0+CODE+SUB CODE+REVISION..... (sheet number + code + sub-code + version number).....?

Reply #2 2009-12-31

As far as I know, there are currently no mandatory regulations regarding the naming of engineering documents; it is each institution that sets its own rules.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

Engineering document naming convention

Thread Content

Submit a Project

Disclaimer

Quick Links