Thread Content
This post was last edited by 328104062 on 2014-12-31 21:05. The facility is set to undergo renovation and expansion, but due to constraints such as the available space, existing pipelines on the ground surface, and underground structures, it has been impossible to determine the layout plan. The workshop has proposed several versions of the plan, yet none of them are perfect. What should be done in such a situation? ? ?
Practicality is the priority; in the future, further upgrades and modifications can serve as supplementary measures. The steel structures such as heat exchange platforms can be made full use of, and some underground pipelines can be shared without the need for re-laying them. Hidden works, heat tracing systems, and the integration with existing equipment all need to be taken into consideration~~~Nothing is perfect; otherwise, there would be no reason to submit suggestions for improvement from year to year
In my opinion, the capacity expansion and renovation of facilities should serve two purposes: 1. Safety and environmental protection; 2. Practical and useful ; The existing ground pipes should be carefully inspected; it is best to use the original ones ; For above-ground pipelines, compared to concealed works, the amount of work required for optimization is less ; Regarding the site, it is best to make full use of it; new equipment foundations should try to avoid existing utility pipelines. When making a choice among the three, it is necessary to find a balance point. Nothing is perfect.
If it’s a new installation, it’s tricky when the site has limited space. For pipelines, it is necessary to make full use of the existing pipe racks.
First, the requirements for fire separation distances must be met. Modifying above-ground pipelines need not be a problem, while below-ground pipelines can be given appropriate protection to minimize any changes.
1. Safe and environmentally friendly. 2. Economical and practical. 3. Balance limited investment at present with future capacity expansion. Once the major principles are established, the rest can be ignored. If you explain your reasons, others will agree.
1. Simplicity 2. Practicality 3. Long-term perspective 4. No waste
The most important thing is to take into account the requirements of the two fire safety codes (building codes and petrochemical industry codes). Previous designs did not impose very strict requirements regarding various safety distances and safety facilities. If a renovation is carried out, it is necessary to coordinate well with local authorities responsible for safety supervision; otherwise, many problems will arise. This is especially true regarding the parts of the codes that have been modified, as the original design may not have taken those changes into account, so special attention must be paid to them.
Saving money for businesses is a top priority; of course, it refers to comprehensive cost savings (including safety, environmental protection, and sustainable development).
As a supplementary note, if it is necessary to add structures such as towers that require underground foundations, it is necessary to find ways to avoid the existing underground pipelines; try not to disturb them whenever possible. I’m most afraid of starting digging now; I don’t even know where the pipes that were modified are located, and digging can easily damage them.
The objectives of new construction projects and renovation projects differ to some extent: New construction projects offer faster speeds, better quality, lower costs, and require less land; Renovation and expansion projects: low investment, rational layout, and maximum reuse of existing equipment.