HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Discussion on Article 4.2.8 of the Code for Design of Petrochemical Control Rooms

2017-08-07View Original

Thread Content

Clause 4.2.8 of the \"Code for Design of Petrochemical Control Rooms\" stipulates that control rooms should not be located adjacent to main substations or regional power distribution substations; if adjacency is necessary due to constraints, they should not share the same building. I would like to ask the experts: if the control room and the substation can be located next to each other, doesn’t that mean they are just two rooms in the same building? If they can be adjacent yet not share the same building, it seems contradictory. How should this be understood? And as long as there is no signal interference in the power distribution and control rooms, isn’t that enough? Why can’t they be in the same building? It doesn’t make any sense:dizzy:. Can’t I set it up in two rooms of a residential building?
Reply #22019-12-10
I don’t understand either. How am I supposed to interpret this? No one is taking orders

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.