Insights on petrochemical DCS
Thread Content
Fellow them in the petrochemical industry, which DCS system do you use? What are its advantages and disadvantages? From Honeywell of those Americans, to domestic brands like Beijing HollySys and LS, as well as Zhejiang Supcon – it seems that the American systems are truly excellent. The Supcon system I’ve been using lately has too many problems and shortcomings. Feel free to share your thoughts
Is it possible that I’m using a fake dashboard? @:@ I can’t even combine a few sets of data/curves into one graph, which makes analysis extremely difficult
Honeywell feels great. .
Private companies don’t use it much, right? . . I was fortunate enough to use it for a year at CNPC
I’ve been using a central control system for many years; it’s quite convenient to use. Now I’m using one from Honeywell, and it’s only been a year since I started using it – I’m still getting used to it. It’s hard to say much; it seems that Honeywell has better stability.
That’s because you didn’t spend enough money and didn’t purchase all the features
We use Honeywell here
Some other devices use those from Yokogawa in Japan
Nor should we generalize about domestic products. What I want to say is that without the emergence of Zhejiang University Zhongkong DCS, these so-called imported products would still have to be priced very high! I remember back then using FOX; a mouse cost 500 dollars, and even after paying, it would take a year before I could get it! It’s not easy to live relying on others!
We joined it as a private company back then; now it has been taken over by a state-owned enterprise: lol