On the safety distance for LNG receiving stations

2017-12-19View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by xahoo on 2017-12-20 at 16:19. Currently, LNG receiving stations are being developed in China; these stations have large storage tanks with capacities of 160,000 cubic meters or 200,000 cubic meters. The safety distances required for such tanks are specified in GB50183. According to this standard, low-temperature LNG tanks refer to those with a capacity of less than 50,000 cubic meters. Therefore, which standard should be used to determine the safety distances between tanks with capacities of 160,000 and 200,000 cubic meters and other facilities? Doesn’t the full-volume tank have any issues with thermal radiation, so there’s no need to consider thermal radiation problems for a dual-volume tank?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

On the safety distance for LNG receiving stations

Thread Content

Related Threads in This Forum

← Previous

Next →

Submit a Project

Disclaimer

Quick Links