HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Discussion on the discrepancy in the number of flange bolt holes between GB/T9119 and JB/T81 for DN65

2019-03-07View Original

Thread Content

1. Table 5 of the national standard GB/T9119-2010 specifies that plate-type butt-weld flanges with PN1.6 rating and DN65 size have 8 bolt holes; 2. Table 4 of JB/T81-2015 from the Ministry of Machinery also specifies that plate-type butt-weld flanges with PN1.6 rating and DN65 size have 4 bolt holes ; The two are contradictory. Question: (1) Since both of these are **grade standards, why can’t they be unified? When to use 8 and when to use 4? Is there an official statement? (2) Additionally, regarding flexible rubber joints, Clause 5.7 of the national standard GB/T26121-2010 specifies that the standards for metal flanges should be in accordance with GB/T9119. Can it be understood that when a flexible rubber joint is fitted with a steel flange, a PN1.6 DN65 flange should have 8 holes? Why are DN65 rubber joints with 4-hole steel flanges available on the market? (3) At the construction site, flexible rubber joints with PN1.6 rating, DN65 size, and 8-hole steel flanges were installed together with DN65 ductile iron valves of the same pressure rating and specifications (having 4 bolt holes), and there was no issue with installation ; However, since the ductile iron flange has 4 holes, it was considered that the rubber joint with 8 holes was sent by mistake, and thus the order for the DN65 rubber joint with 8 holes was rejected. Is this approach correct? Experts are welcome to share their opinions or suggestions; please send them to RQSS99@ALIYUN.COM. Thank you.
Reply #22019-03-07
GB/T denotes recommended standards, whereas GB represents mandatory standards that must be followed. It’s normal for standards to differ; what’s the point of coming up with two standards when a complete citation is already available?
Reply #32020-01-05
In the old standard 9119, there are 4 bolts, while in the 20592 standard there are 8. The notes specify that 4 bolts can also be used. DN65 is a rather awkward size – it’s neither large nor small; simply indicate how many bolt holes are required when placing the order.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.