HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Old K says every week – talking about things in the petrochemical design industry. Post 42: A cost analysis of hydrogen energy

2021-04-03View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by henglinkou on 2021-4-6 at 16:49. Old K’s weekly series – Talks about things in the petrochemical design industry, Post 42: A cost analysis of hydrogen energy. Currently, hydrogen energy is quite popular; hydrogen itself is a clean energy source, but it cannot be obtained directly from nature. Hydrogen must be produced using other energy sources, so it is considered a secondary energy source. So, is hydrogen energy really a clean energy source? Let’s do some calculations now. Assuming hydrogen is produced using the cleanest possible method, the process involves: solar power generation – electrolytic hydrogen production – hydrogen liquefaction – storage and transportation of liquid hydrogen – utilization of hydrogen as an energy source. The calorific value of hydrogen is 143,000 kJ/kg. Sequence Number, Process Energy Consumption (kJ/kg of hydrogen), CO2 Emissions: 1. Solar power generation – The production of solar panel materials is energy-intensive, and a large amount of CO2 is emitted during this process. 2. Electrolytic hydrogen production – The minimum theoretical value is 143,000; this figure does not include the energy consumption associated with producing the equipment needed for electrolytic hydrogen production, and CO2 is emitted during that process as well. 3. Hydrogen liquefaction – Using the current world minimum consumption level of 46,800, CO2 is emitted during the production of equipment for hydrogen liquefaction. 4. Hydrogen storage and transportation – There is energy consumption and losses involved in storing and transporting hydrogen, with estimates suggesting these amounts are greater than 3%; 4,290 is the value related to CO2 emissions during hydrogen transportation. 5. Use of hydrogen energy – The energy efficiency of electric vehicles powered by hydrogen is around 80%, but it is estimated that the energy efficiency of hydrogen energy will be lower than 80%; therefore, 80% is used as an estimate here. Based on the table above, the maximum efficiency of energy utilization from solar power generation to hydrogen use is: 143000*0.8/(143000+46800) = 60.3%. It can be seen from these figures that even with the optimal route for hydrogen production, it is difficult to consider it a clean energy source. Therefore, hydrogen energy derived from coal, natural gas, and similar sources is by no means a clean energy source. Furthermore, hydrogen is extremely dangerous; if all cars were powered by hydrogen, the consequences of severe traffic accidents or misuse by malicious actors would be unimaginable. Tip: You can enter “Lao K’s Weekly Updates – Talks on Matters in the Petrochemical Design Industry” into the website’s search engine to view previously posted articles
Reply #22021-04-03
The power of a hydrogen bomb has little to do with hydrogen energy, right? .
Reply #32021-04-03
Hydrogen can be produced from water, which is one of the most abundant resources on Earth.
Reply #42021-04-04
What it manifests in its final stage is green energy.
Reply #52021-04-04
Hydrogen production using offshore wind power, with the hydrogen being transported via official pipelines for use in heating – is the energy consumption still high in this case? Hydrogen does not have to be liquefied for use.
Reply #62021-04-04
The cost of delivering electricity directly should be lower than the cost of producing hydrogen and transporting it, right? It seems a bit redundant
Reply #72021-04-04
Electricity is an energy source that cannot be stored; so why are there so many wind and solar power plants that are not connected to the grid? Offshore wind farms have step-up stations, and the costs associated with electricity generation there are also very high.
Reply #82021-04-05
It does not deny that hydrogen is used for special purposes, but it should be problematic as a general consumer product
Reply #92021-04-05
Agreed; without a technological breakthrough, it’s difficult to achieve widespread use
Reply #102021-04-05
Hydrogen energy and hydrogen bombs? OP, are you serious? Uranium can be used to make nuclear bombs. In our **traditional overglaze painting technique, one of the raw materials is a compound of uranium

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.