Shanghai Huisheng VS Foster Wheeler
Thread Content
I have three years of work experience, and I have received offers from these two companies for the position of process engineer. I’m not sure how to decide which one to choose; anyone with insight could please give me some advice. The main considerations are technical expertise accumulation and personal development; thank you! :)
All the companies seem good; it appears that Huisheng is a bit better. I’m not aware of the specific details. You’re really lucky, OP
Haha, of course I’ll go where they offer more money. No doubt about it. Hehehehe
At this stage, you still need to learn more* and gain more experience; it’s better to go to Huisheng, where there are more tasks and thus more opportunities to learn
Your skills are really impressive, bro; I’ve been in design for 8 years, yet Bai Kede still looks down on me. At the top universities in the country, or those with an international background, people will say that your skills aren’t good enough – it’s really unfortunate.
Baikebode is a labor service center; judging from your attitude, they’ll probably set a high price, and others will just find some excuse to reject you
Yes, Encode is now losing money on its EPC projects every year, so it has stopped doing that and focuses only on design work. This company doesn’t seem very good. If I were to go, I’d at least demand 35k or more, haha.
Thank you for all your suggestions. Companies like Fluor and Bechtel do have high requirements, but the others should be fine
This post was last edited by truelies on 2012-5-28 09:09. Brother, could you briefly share your experience so that we can all assess whether it’s worth 35K/m?:) Currently, Bechtel remains the largest EPC contractor in the United States, with Fluor coming right after it. It’s just that Bechtel is not adapted to the engineering market with Chinese characteristics 21.
Design work is hard work; there’s no choice – you have to pick the job with the best pay.
I tried to bluff, but my brother exposed me right away, hehehe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .