Can these two weld evaluations be used to assess this weld?
Thread Content
The material of the equipment is Q345R, with a thickness of 14 mm; the welding methods used are manual welding and automatic welding. May I ask whether it is possible to use a weld assessment for a Q345R component with a thickness of 6 mm welded by manual methods, and another weld assessment for a Q345R component with a thickness of 6 mm welded using automatic welding, in order to evaluate this weld?
No, it’s not possible. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
It’s not quite clear yet; I’m here to learn* as well
For manual welding, 6 mm thickness can reach up to 12 mm; for automatic welding, 6 mm thickness can also reach 12 mm. When combined, the total thickness can reach 24 mm
The weld metal thickness can be covered, but the workpiece thickness cannot.
The material of the equipment is Q345R, with a thickness of 14 mm; the welding methods used are manual welding and automatic welding. May I ask whether it is possible to use a weld assessment for a Q345R component with a thickness of 6 mm welded by manual methods, and another weld assessment for a Q345R component with a thickness of 6 mm welded using automatic welding, in order to evaluate this weld? Change 6mm to 8mm and that will do
Those with harsh conditions can override those with less harsh conditions, and vice versa
I think I remember that an X-shaped groove will suffice; I’m not sure if that’s correct.
This post was last edited by qdxf on 2023-10-10 at 11:18. Composite welds cannot cover areas where thickness ranges overlap; just remember that the resulting range should be the intersection rather than the union, and then there will be no problems.