Discussion on edition area adjustments

With the West-to-East Gas Pipeline project and the construction of LNG receiving stations in various coastal cities, the field of oil and gas storage and transportation is developing at a rapid pace. It seems there are also many people in this field within the forum, and the future development direction could also focus on oil and gas storage and transportation~ I request that the leadership consider this. Additionally, it would be possible to attract technical and economic experts from various fields to the forum in order to broaden perspectives. This post was last edited by icesharp on 2007-12-2 at 16:27.]

I’m glad to see that next year the area dedicated to professional technical exchanges in the public sector will be separated as a distinct entity, with electrical (electronic control) and automatic control systems being handled separately； Previously, I wanted to recommend zhx7540 as the actual moderator, mainly in charge of the electrical aspects at present. zhx7540 is a team member I recommend; currently, for the vast majority of electrical issues in the industrial control area, his precise and straightforward responses have resolved many inquiry posts. This person is a QQ friend I have never met; they have repeatedly picked up the phone to inquire about prices for group (QQ) friends and then forwarded that information within the group. But he is currently very busy, as he is in charge of an entire electrical and instrumentation department. They politely declined my proposal. If separating electricity and instrumentation is a settled matter, I’ll give it another try. Or everyone should pay more attention to talents in this field.   I agree that software-related topics should be placed in a discussion area. It is recommended to consider reducing computer software and computer application technologies, and removing all materials that are not directly related to work, such as instructions on how to type the character “ “囍”, operating system tips, media tools, screen savers, and the like ； Keep the format conversion software, file recovery tools, and utility software (for office use) that are directly useful to most of us. Requests for help are allowed, and assistance can be provided. Because we are never a professional software sharing site; the software versions are not always the latest, and the members of the forum do not necessarily have the highest expertise in this area. Copyright issues as well as problems related to viruses/malware must all be taken into consideration.     It is recommended to consider splitting the area for discussions on construction technology & project management: construction technology and construction management fall under the category of natural sciences, as they are directly related to the site and the implementation process ； Place it at the end of the public professional technical exchange area, as it may involve discussions on the implementation details related to multiple specialties. The project management communication area, as a separate section that serves as a starting point for handling tasks and interacting with people, falls under the category of social sciences; in the future, other types of \"management\" sections can be added. Such as production management, etc.   I took a look at the article-sharing section; there are many posts but few downloads. It seems we’re just a transit point. If I were looking for information, I would also turn to Google, companies in related industries, and company websites as my first choices. But it’s necessary to have such sections; after all, there will always be people uploading this kind of material. I’m not sure if canceling the file upload and adding +1 wealth will work.       The sample area is also a challenge. If it really doesn’t work, just cancel it; after all, there are dedicated sections for each specialty to handle the traffic ； Moreover, in the sample area, samples related to electrical/control systems and equipment make up the vast majority.     Think boldly for a moment – I wonder if it’s possible to set this up this way: next year, all documents with attachments will be placed in a special area; after being reviewed, the moderators there will sort them and place them in the respective document sections of each discussion area. Then, the scores given by the moderators of each section (or those in the moderation area); this makes it easier to standardize the scoring criteria. Advantages: 1. It prevents duplicate posts to the greatest extent possible, with an accuracy rate of over 90% ； 2. It prevents new members from sending out a large amount of information right from the start in order to earn +1 in wealth ； 3. For materials posted in an irregular manner, aside from high-quality materials that are edited by moderators and then moved elsewhere, all other materials available online remain in this review area ； 4. Force members to prioritize searching for and utilizing the existing materials on this forum ； 5. It emphasizes a development direction focused on forum-based exchanges. 6. Materials that have not passed the review after 15 days will be deleted. At the same time, send a message to all posters: The material was not accepted; please resubmit it in a proper format.   This forum section can have 10 moderators or even more. Only .jpg format attachments are allowed in the discussion area. When requesting review for attaching attachments in a help-seeking post, include the help request link.   Personally, I expect the number of members to reach 300,000–400,000 next year, depending on whether the forum’s management can keep up in a timely manner. In short, the forum is growing, and the administrator must take diversity in management into account ； Otherwise, the enthusiasm of managers can easily fade, which is a loss for sustainable and stable development. I’m tired; I’ll add more once I think of something. This post was last edited by cocain on 2007-12-3 01:02]