HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

The trade-off between CO2 and consumption

2007-12-02View Original

Thread Content

Our company’s production method involves using fixed-layer batch gas generators to produce semi-water gas. The company’s management has differing opinions regarding how to reduce CO2 emissions and coal consumption; please discuss how to make a decision in this regard :handshake
Reply #22007-12-02
I believe the focus should be on reducing coal (lump coal) consumption. The reasons are as follows: 1. Reducing CO2 actually means reducing steam consumption; increasing the CO content and, after conversion, increasing the H2 content facilitates the synthesis reaction. However, reducing the steam input too much can easily cause scarring inside the furnace. 2. Within the factory, lump coal is used in larger quantities than bituminous coal, and its price is almost twice that of bituminous coal; therefore, it is more cost-effective to save lump coal rather than bituminous coal.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.