Where should production technology go?
Thread Content
With the improvement of the degree of automation, instruments and automation will partially replace the labor of operators, and the role of operators will gradually weaken. For example, when parking in the past, the squad leader may be required to judge the accident and deal with it in time. Now it is interlocking, which cannot be automatically adjusted. When it reaches interlocking, it will stop interlocking, and the reliability of interlocking is getting higher and higher. So where should production technology go in the future?
Sit on the 2nd floor. In fact, the development of these automations is inseparable from production technology. Without the accumulation of production technology, where would so many automated controls come from? They must develop mutually. After all, no one can tell what will happen in the future. I personally think that we still need to have production technology, or choose good automated equipment.
No matter how good the machine is, it was invented by people, and it needs people to control it, so the technology still needs to be developed, and it needs to be more sophisticated!
No matter how advanced the control system is, its selection parameters, process conditions, and control plans still need to be provided by process technology. No matter how advanced the automation control is, there will always be fluctuations and instability, which must be adjusted and corrected by someone. Chains and the like can only ensure safety but not normal production. Whether the process requires this experience, or it requires technical personnel to explore and think in practice. In short, technology is always in need!
The instrument is just a tool, and it is ultimately up to people to direct. How can we ignore production technology. Besides, doesn’t it require experience and technology to judge whether an alarm should be reported or an action should be taken (interlocking action)?
Concentrate on technology... you will feel you can use it in the future.
I am the production technology section chief of our company. I don't think production technology should be responsible for these instrument controls. I think production technology should be responsible for: 1. Improvement of process technology and rationalization of processes ； 2. Improve equipment capabilities and improve production efficiency ； 3. Solve frequent faults ； 4. Save costs and reduce energy consumption ； 5. Formulation, planning, design, contact purchase, assembly and commissioning of new equipment and new solutions 6. Improvement of product quality, etc. Maybe our company's production technology and the production technology you mentioned are two different concepts. However, since I am engaged in technology, I think the above aspects are the way to go. It is also the meaning of the existence of production technology courses. As for instruments, mechanical failures, stability of production conditions, monitoring, etc., they should be the responsibility of the repair department and the manufacturing department, not the production technology department.