HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Container design

2007-12-08View Original

Thread Content

Today, container design manufacturers design the required skids (mainly for storage tanks) as feet. Is such a design reasonable? For example, in the case of a tank with a diameter of DN1800 mm. This post was last edited by tulongshao on 2007-12-10 at 12:55
Reply #22007-12-08
I think that when both leg supports and skirt bases are available, it’s better to use leg supports. They are simpler and easier to install.
Reply #32007-12-08
As long as the calculation passes, it can be used.
Reply #42007-12-08
Take a close look at the scope of application for standard JB/T4713-92 supports: 1. Diameter ranges from DN400 to DN1600 mm; 2. The ratio of the cylinder length L to its nominal diameter DN is L/DN
Reply #52007-12-08
Check the standards; if the calculation is correct, it’s fine.
Reply #62007-12-08
Supporting bearings can be used for diameters of up to 4 meters. Calculate the leg bending moment; it’s sufficient as long as the shear force on the gusset plate welds or the stress on the head is within acceptable limits. This post was last edited by Wen Bing on 2007-12-8 at 14:05.]
Reply #72007-12-08
Are the legs leg-type supports? If the leg-type support does not meet the standards, the design firm can prepare a calculation report; if the report is reasonable and the calculations show that the support is suitable, then there should be no problem. If there’s no calculation value, I really wouldn’t dare to use it this way. :)
Reply #82007-12-08
:lol :victory: There should be no problem! !
Reply #92007-12-09
I understand now. Thank you all for your guidance; a diameter of less than 1600 mm and a height within 4000 mm will suffice.
Reply #102007-12-09
If the calculation sheet is reasonable and the calculations pass the checks for the supports, then there should be no problems.
Reply #112007-12-10
It’s fine as long as the calculations are correct; for example, large spherical tanks usually use legs!
Reply #122007-12-10
If the calculations are satisfactory, using legs is better than a skirt base – it’s simpler and more aesthetically pleasing, and easier to install, maintain, and operate
Reply #132007-12-10
Although leg supports can be used through calculations, the manufacturing unit has no right to alter the design created by the design unit; any changes and calculations related to the pressure vessel’s structure must be carried out by the design unit responsible for it. If the manufacturing unit wishes to make any changes, it must submit a design change request to the design unit; such changes can only be made upon approval by the design unit. This is part of the management procedures related to the manufacture of pressure vessels.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.