Thread Content
1. In terms of ethylene, SEI Design Institute is among the best in the country; it is capable of carrying out PMC project management, and its work is conducted with great rigor and professionalism; 2. HQCEC Design Institute is now a design institute affiliated with CNPC; it has solid technical capabilities, is particularly strong in PP projects, though its work style is average. Nevertheless, its overall strength ranks it among the top institutions in China ; 3. The Luoyang branch of the Second Hospital is strong in gasification ; 4. The Wuhan branch of the Fourth Academy has made significant progress in gasification over the past few years ; 5. The Xi’an branch of the Sixth Research Institute is average. 6. In terms of oil refining, SEI, HQ, and the Beijing Design Institute are all excellent; I give priority to SEI Design Institute ;
What about CNPC Fushun Design Institute?
What about Tianchen, Chengda, and the others? Let me also introduce it: lol
The preferred options for oil refining are SEI and LPEC (Luoyang Institute). I’ve never heard of any global oil refining operations. Those with strong overall capabilities are still SEI, LPEC, Chengda, and Huanyu. The rest are just average.
Overall, these design institutes are all quite good
They are all from Sinopec; there’s no information about CNPC
Luoyang Institute – how did it become the Second Institute? China Huatai Engineering Company (the Second Design Institute of the Ministry of Chemical Industry); I don’t understand
There’s also the Ningbo Design Institute, which is also very strong. I hope we can all list out the design institutes we are familiar with and their strengths, so as to broaden our horizons and facilitate our work
From this introduction, it can only be said that my knowledge is limited; sei, Huanqiu, Lepec, 1,2,3,4,6,8 – each chemical engineering design institute has its own strengths. Without the monopoly held by Sinopec and CNPC, those earlier-established companies might not be able to compete with those later-established ones. The system determines success or failure, not ability