HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Comparison between evaporative condensers and traditional condensers and their usage requirements

2007-12-12View Original

Thread Content

In recent years, evaporative condensers have been widely adopted in the refrigeration industry as well as other sectors. As explained, an evaporative condenser is an optimized combination of a water-cooled condenser, a water pump, a cooling tower, a water tank, and water connection pipelines. It offers advantages such as low investment costs, a simple operation process, a compact structure, and small floor space, giving it significant benefits over traditional water-cooled condensers. Is that really the case? Can evaporative condensers meet the requirements of continuous and stable operation in chemical production? What are the water quality requirements for evaporative condensers, and what is the situation regarding scaling in these condensers? What will the final shipping cost be? Wait, discussions are welcome.
Reply #22008-02-02
Why isn’t anyone discussing it: lol :lol
Reply #32008-02-02
Evaporative condensers do have some advantages, but I believe they have many disadvantages as well. The most significant issue is that the fans are located in the air-cooling area, which means their bearings operate in a steam-filled environment; as a result, their lifespan is short, usually not exceeding 3 months. Moreover, it is quite difficult to replace these bearings, and the conditions in the area where maintenance is carried out are extremely hot. Motors also have this problem; they are prone to damage due to moisture. Furthermore, high requirements are placed on water quality; soft water also requires the addition of chemicals to prevent the growth of organic matter. Also, the water consumption is high, and the cost of softening water must be taken into account as well. The specific operating costs have not been calculated; it is estimated that there will be no savings in operating costs compared to dry air cooling. I think, if there’s a choice, an air-cooled version would be better. This post was last edited by pydch on 2008-2-2 23:26]
Reply #42008-02-03
I don’t quite understand evaporative condensers, so I’ll just learn about them*

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.