Yankuang Guotai gasification technology exported abroad
Thread Content
This post was last edited by lflsedin on 2014-9-17 at 21:37. Not long ago, an American chemical company called from overseas to officially inform Yankuang Guotai Chemical Co., Ltd. that, after two on-site inspections, the American board of directors had decided to purchase Guotai Chemical’s new gasification furnace technology. This will be the first time that our country’s coal gasification technology is exported abroad. 15 years ago, a gasifier of world-class standard from Texaco in the United States was installed at Lunan Fertilizer Plant. Through innovation, the technical staff from Yankuang increased the maximum continuous operating time per gasifier from 55 days to 77 days, setting a record for such types of gasifiers; as a result, they were awarded the Best Overseas Operation Award by Texaco’s headquarters in the United States. Today, Yankuang Group and East China University of Science and Technology have jointly developed a new type of multi-nozzle opposed gasifier, whose process, economic, and environmental performance metrics are superior to those of the Texaco gasification technology, which has earned it favor in the United States. Yankuang Guotai Chemical Co., Ltd. possesses new acetic acid synthesis technologies and gas power generation technologies with independent intellectual property rights, and it is also at the forefront of the world, breaking the monopoly of multinational corporations on China’s coal chemical technologies. “The province ** and Yankuang Group have decided to use us as the leader in building the Lunan Coal Chemical Industry Base on a high standard and with a high starting point; we should make the necessary contribution to the revitalization of Shandong’s chemical industry. ”Ding Hui, general manager of Yankuang Guotai Chemical, told reporters. Last March, Yankuang Guotai Chemical signed a technology transfer contract with Bohai Group’s Tianjin Alkali Plant, transferring the acetic acid synthesis technology to Tianjin Alkali Plant for 60 million yuan. This is the first time that a domestic coal chemical enterprise has transferred technology to a salt chemical enterprise. At the end of 2003, Yankuang Guotai transferred a new software package for acetic acid synthesis to Daqing Chemical Company. Recently, senior executives from Daqing Chemical Company have made frequent visits to Yankuang Guotai to discuss the acquisition of new gasification furnace technology, with the aim of using advanced coal chemical technologies to adjust their existing oil and gas chemical production processes. Academician Xie Kechang, a renowned expert in coal chemical engineering, stated that the facilities of Yankuang Guotai have created a multi-product production system that integrates coal utilization, power generation, and chemical production, enabling the clean circular use of coal. Moreover, these facilities allow 800,000 tons of high-sulfur coal that could not be mined due to environmental concerns to be put to use again. According to statistics, from January 2006 to the end of October this year, Yankuang Guotai Chemical has transferred 28 sets of new gasification furnaces as well as two sets of acetic acid synthesis technologies with an annual production capacity of 200,000 tons. Clients from provinces and cities such as Shaanxi and Shanxi, as well as countries like India, are also coming one after another to request purchase of Guotai Chemical’s high-tech products.
Compared to Texaco, Yankuang’s technical advantage lies in its strength at large scales; generally, when the scale exceeds 1500, Yankuang has an advantage. As scaling up becomes a trend, Yankuang’s technology indeed has better prospects than Texaco’s.
Congratulations! I hope that **our own technology can flourish both at home and abroad!
Is it appropriate for domestic medium-sized enterprises to adopt four-nozzle systems? For example, can a company with an annual production capacity of 300,000 tons of synthetic ammonia afford to invest 1.4 billion to acquire the entire set of equipment?
The original poster’s view is too one-sided. Zaozhuang Mining played an indelible role in the development of the four-nozzle technology, but it can’t be attributed solely to their technology; the fundamental aspects of this technology still come from East China University of Science and Technology
Investment comparison (300,000 tons/year methanol plant): Unit: 10,000 yuan. Name: HT–L Shell Texaco. Patent fee: 1,500; 6,000; 6,800. Gasification unit: 38,000; 66,000; 40,000. Air separation unit: 18,000; 18,000; 26,000. Other units: 45,000; 60,000; 45,000. Total: 102,500; 150,000; 117,800. The four-nozzle system is not much more expensive than the Texaco system; it’s completely feasible to invest 1.4 billion yuan in a complete set of four-nozzle equipment.
Suddenly news comes that a tiger once lay in wait among men... Congratulations
China’s steel industry is already at the forefront of the world; with teams such as Yankuang Group and East China University of Science and Technology, our coal gasification industry will soon also be among the best in the world!
This news is truly inspiring; I hope this technology will become more mature and be widely adopted in the future
Good news. I hope our country will have more coal chemical technologies with independent intellectual property rights.
Domestic technologies should be vigorously promoted; if foreigners can do it, then Chinese people can definitely do it just as well.
What do you mean? I don’t understand what you’re saying. Doesn’t Guohong use this technology? Many people have gone to Guotai by driving with Guohong. Our roots lie in Luhua
Guotai’s carbonylation acetic acid production process seems to have been designed by the Shanghai Chemical Engineering Design Institute, right? Independent research and development? How is it possible that both the manufacturing process and the process design are exactly the same as those of Jiangsu Supor? The original poster is quite clever: lol. As for the so-called four-nozzle gasification, aside from the different arrangement of the nozzles, I can’t see what’s unique about it. Calling a cyclone separator an innovation? Is calling a carbon scrubber a water scrubber an innovation? Is the evaporative hot water tower an innovation? From coal grinding to gasification and then to slag and water, Texaco’s presence can be seen everywhere. This is the principle of borrowing that Mr. Lu Xun advocated! Cathay’s decision-makers are truly remarkable – not only can they acquire things, but they can also sell them for money! It’s not only sold to domestic customers, but it can also be exported... I think that in the future, aside from Haier, only Guotai will be able to make a name for itself on the international stage! Learn from Cathay’s approach of adopting what works, and help create brilliance for Cathay! ! ! !
Is the poster from Cathay Pacific? How dare you, Cathay Pacific – you’re so shameless. It’s clearly a patent of Huali and Luhua Coal Chemical Center, yet you insist on saying it’s Guotai’s technology. The original poster should be honest and upright. I also received Americans who came for a visit; the discussions were mainly with the Coal Chemical Engineering Center of Luhua. Your President Sun and President Zhu were also present, but it was the Coal Chemical Center that played the key role in those discussions. The original poster, you must have come from North Korea. This post was last edited by jiajin on 2008-1-9 08:53]
Does Luhua belong to the Yankuang Group?
Cathay really has forgotten its roots; now that its output value is high and its profits are good, it dares to be so arrogant? Is it something from your family? Isn’t it Luhua, developed together with the Center and East China? I can still accept it if it’s called Yankuang’s, but calling it yours is absolutely intolerable! ! ! ! ! :@
It seems like there’s a civil war going on; that shouldn’t be the case
“15 years ago, a gasifier of world-class standard from Texaco in the United States was installed at Lunan Fertilizer Plant. Through innovation, the technical staff from Yankuang increased the maximum continuous operating time per gasifier from 55 days to 77 days, setting a record for such types of gasifiers; as a result, they were awarded the Best Overseas Operation Award by Texaco’s headquarters in the United States. ” :Oh, 15 years ago, Luhua had no connection with Yankuang, right? ? ? How could it be a technician from Yankuang? It should be Luhua’s technical staff. . It has been 197 days since Lu Hua started operating:victory: This post was last edited by Xiao Chen on 2008-1-10 09:57.]
It’s indeed a civil war; I’m stirring up the chaos
Hehe, why did the beauty make another mistake after being corrected in another post? The Luhua plant operates its furnace for 198 days per cycle, so how could the beauty claim that this number is too low?
It might be two recordings, and both of them are really great