How to handle malicious ratings?
Thread Content
Some time ago, I saw proposals for speculative behavior involving mutual rating, and I have doubts about this; I wonder how such things can be restricted and dealt with. Now that the forum has a rating system in place, how should new members be managed? Method 1: For the same ID, a member’s daily ratings for Charm and Wealth shall not exceed 50% of their maximum rating capacity for that day (exceptions apply to moderators) ； The total number of monthly scoring attempts shall not exceed 70% of its total score. (Except for the moderator.) Method 2: If consecutive and numerous ratings are given to the same user or users with the same ID, accounting for more than 70% of their total score, the administrator can deduct 50% of the points earned by such users as being improperly obtained; meanwhile, 20% of the points given by those who rated will be deducted as a warning. Whether it is feasible or not, I hope everyone will discuss and organize this in order to establish standards for HaiChuan.
Questions: Are there also ratings and malicious behavior?
If you’re not a moderator, you don’t know how busy moderators are every day. Personally, I think it’s best not to recommend such meaningless management tasks to them. Regardless of the score from the same ID, as long as his scores are generally accurate, his comments are also mostly correct, the scores do not exceed the limits set by the forum, and they comply with the current rules, why should the moderators interfere? There are so many things that need to be managed in the layout; there are matters more important than these trivial issues waiting for their attention.
The forum currently does not seem to have the resources to manage things in such detail; more management staff are needed to meet the basic requirements.
There are rules on this forum; the original poster can take a look
The scoring rules are available on the forum; the original poster can take a look
“The pure will remain pure, and the impure will remain impure. ”After seeing this post and everyone’s replies, I thought of \"Chengcai\" and \"Xu Sanduo\" from the currently popular TV series \"Soldiers Strike\". On the Haichuan Forum, there is not only \"Chengcai\" but also \"Xu Sanduo\". Thinking about Xu Sanduo’s attitude toward Chengcai in the TV series, I am willing to be Haichuan’s \"Xu Sanduo\".
Sometimes there’s nothing you can do: 1. Most resources have already been uploaded, so it’s not easy to find new ones； 2. The rank is low, with no position; the score obtained is lower compared to those in higher ranks with positions, resulting in unequal pay for equal work ； 3. Technical posts are difficult; they cannot be resolved without expertise in that field, and the path to obtaining rewards is narrow ； 4. There are many restrictions on resource downloads, either in terms of level or funding ； Therefore, sometimes one can only rely on vulnerabilities in forums to increase their salary level and earnings; it’s a measure taken out of necessity. In new forums, such phenomena are significantly reduced.
It’s not possible to do as mentioned above – sometimes one can only use loopholes in the forum to increase their own salary level. This can’t be considered a loophole; the forum merely gives you the power to rate things, while also stating that those who give unfair ratings will have their scores reduced by twice or three times. If I were to rate myself, that would definitely be considered giving an unfair rating. No matter how good something is, if it’s truly good, then moderators or other members will surely rate it positively. If sometimes no one notices it, but the poster thinks it’s good, they can send a message to the moderators or administrators. If it’s indeed good, someone will surely give it a positive rating. However, it’s impossible to ensure absolute fairness, as some people might find certain content good while others don’t
After browsing some topics and replies, my impression of the ratings is that the ‘big names’ help each other out; it’s not uncommon for replies that are essentially filler to also receive high scores. It’s not as good for beginners. Should there be rules in place to prevent the bad practice of key figures boosting each other?
If you encounter such situations, you can report them; if it is confirmed to be true, the administrators and moderators will take action! This post was last edited by Bincheng Watcher on 2007-12-17 16:26.]
There’s no need to report it; anyone who browses around can see it.
The problem has been resolved; scoring is no longer allowed for the same source address. A handshake mechanism was recommended, but I think this approach is too strict as it prevents different members who log in using the same ID from doing so. :Overall, I’m still quite happy; this idea came about after seeing a post mention it. It’s still good to have this now; it can help eliminate some malicious methods, and HaiChuan also needs to be reorganized. It is now being implemented gradually. :Victory: Those who make requests should be responsible for their actions; they needn’t fear being called right, but it’s still better to be cautious in situations where there might be misunderstandings. (My personal opinion)
It’s hard to define this issue, you know. If someone evaluates things under normal conditions and you claim it’s malicious, then what should be done?