HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Issues with the use of filtering devices

2007-12-20View Original

Thread Content

Our company produces chemical raw materials using electrolysis. After high-voltage municipal electricity of 10,000 volts enters the facility, it goes to the high-voltage chamber; after leaving that chamber, it is stepped down in voltage using a transformer. Following that, it enters a rectifier cabinet where AC is converted to DC, and finally the desired DC current and voltage are generated. It is designed as one transformer with two rectifier cabinets. May I ask, when installing harmonic filtering devices, should one set be installed alongside the transformer, or two sets alongside the rectifier cabinet?
Reply #22007-12-22
Two sets are installed in conjunction with the rectifier cabinet, which provides better filtering effects.
Reply #32008-07-06
No way, it should be sufficient to install a set of filters on the bus bar connected in parallel with the transformer. That’s what we do, and I’ve just completed a project of this kind.
Reply #42008-07-06
If the harmonic current is not high, it should be installed on the high-voltage side of the rectifier transformer
Reply #52008-07-14
From what the original poster says, it seems to be a rectifier cabinet installed on the low-voltage side.:lol I agree with the suggestion above – it’s best to have a professional manufacturer specializing in filtering and compensation carry out tests to determine the level of harmonics present, so as to decide on the most appropriate filtering method. If the harmonic levels are not high, compensation can be done on the transformer side; compensating at the equipment level increases costs, and the price of filtering and compensation devices is already high, especially active filtering devices. In the original poster’s case, passive filtering should suffice. Haha, the cost would be in the hundreds of thousands, depending on the size of the transformer and whether dynamic or static compensation is used
Reply #62008-07-15
In terms of performance, compensation near the device is more effective, as it allows for the targeted elimination of the harmonics generated by the rectifier, especially in the case of passive filtering. Moreover, such compensation can effectively prevent harmonics from interfering with other devices on the common bus.
Reply #72008-07-15
Based on what you’ve described, the previous set of harmonic filtering devices will suffice. But first, I suggest that your factory conduct actual tests on the harmonic levels in the power supply system, and then carry out harmonic mitigation based on the results of those tests.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.