Members with the same IP address are no longer allowed to rate each other starting today!
Thread Content
1. Starting from May 30, 2007, members in Grade 2 and above of “Haichuan Primary School” have the permission to evaluate wealth. Posts that you consider excellent can earn you wealth points. 2. At the same time, the scoring rules for the technical exchange area have been adjusted; the system now awards +0 wealth instead of +1 wealth for replies to posts. *Those who give arbitrary ratings regarding wealth will have their scores reduced by twice or three times*. The same post cannot be rated more than once. 3. Rating each other using the same IP address is prohibited; if this is detected, in cases where the offense is not severe, a warning via internal message will result in a score reduction the first time, while a further reduction will apply the second time (if the bonus for mutual rating cannot be determined, it will be decided subjectively). It came into effect on December 22, 2007. For the sake of order in the forum, thank you all for your support.
We will firmly implement the boss’s new resolution, but what is a simple way to determine whether they come from the same IP? Could the boss come up with some operating procedures? That way, this phenomenon can be detected as quickly as possible and addressed promptly.
Some technical teams and management teams can view the IP addresses. There are currently over 300 supervisors
Boss, is it possible to see someone else’s IP address without any special tools? I didn’t find any relevant information in the forum’s help section; I’m not sure how to proceed. Please tell us the specific method for checking someone’s IP address.
I want to be a supervisor too, boss. Is that okay? In response to your call, I want to get actively involved!
It is good! But some companies only have one IP! So what should we do? ? ?
This happened in the small event within the computer section this time: people answered questions using the same IP address repeatedly. My conservative approach was to keep the score obtained from the first answer using that IP address, and not assign any scores for subsequent answers. But situations like those mentioned above do exist; in our CNOOC system, for example, the local area networks of several or even a dozen companies come together to form a wide area network that extends from Tianjin to Yantai, and they share one external IP address, with most people not knowing each other. In any case, the administrator’s approach does indeed help to minimize the phenomenon of account manipulation for score inflation, and there is indeed no good way to identify the situations I mentioned; therefore, it is best to respect and follow the administrator’s decisions.
The moderators have good intentions, as this can prevent some cheating, but only some of it. Most current internet users are assigned IP addresses dynamically, and the rules regarding a single IP address can only address the issue of simultaneous online usage.
I think it would be better to try it out for a while first, see the results, and then decide whether to implement it officially.
This can, to a certain extent, eliminate the drawback of self-rating.
It’s good, but I hope the admin will consider those who haven’t registered for the forum. I think it would be better to allow them to try it out for a while to see if it will affect the forum’s popularity, as after all, the popularity of the forum is the foundation for its long-term development.
It’s better for everyone to take a little more time and pay more attention in daily life. For example, warn him first; if he’s guilty, he won’t come to the moderator to seek resolution. If he’s not guilty, then the company’s shared IP address mentioned earlier will be used, and he’ll get in touch with the moderator to explain things, which will clarify the issue. However, it’s possible that some people will try to take advantage of this situation, and in that case, there really isn’t much that can be done.
No reason is acceptable. Do not rate each other if you share the same IP.
1. If scoring could truly be fair, there wouldn’t be so many members seeking to make money in this way. 2. Look at regular members versus those in certain management or technical groups: they have almost the same resources and suggestions, but there is often a significant difference in the scores they receive. Who wouldn’t be willing to show some favoritism toward the management and technical groups? 3. In this way, peer evaluations using the same IP are nothing but unauthorized tactics employed by members of lower rank to earn a little more wealth; at most, it amounts to just a few points of wealth. As for certain management groups and technical groups, they receive fewer favors, ranging from dozens of wealth units to just a few charm points; in comparison, those within the same IP range are nothing in comparison. If restrictions are to be imposed, it is hoped that the number and quality of scores obtained by the management team and the technical team can both be supervised and managed. Should the scoring for these two teams be carried out by a specially established team? 4. To determine whether what is said is true, everyone can just check the ratings obtained by the administrators and the technical team, as well as those obtained by ordinary members – that will be sufficient. Let me state some facts; please understand. 5. After reading what the brothers below have said, I’ve been working for 6 years and I understand how society works; that’s why I’m just bringing this up. After all, it’s just a virtual community, and it’s just for discussion purposes. I respect everyone. Thank you. This post was last edited by zqcjjy651 on 2007-12-22 at 18:03.]
You have spoken out the feelings of many regular members. That’s how reality is, and that’s also how society works. There is no absolute fairness, but the development of the forum relies on everyone’s efforts to maintain it, support it, and contribute to it. If you have the ability, then get involved more! Don’t worry too much about wealth; be a law-abiding good citizen. Please respect and follow the decisions of the administrators!
When under someone’s roof, one must learn to bow one’s head. . . . . . Hehe
It’s better not to rate each other if you’re on the same IP address. Even if it’s people on the same IP who don’t know each other, there are so many people in the country anyway; it shouldn’t matter if they rate you or not
Support the moderators, as this promotes fairness
Some forums refrain from granting rating permissions out of fear of arbitrary ratings
Support: handshake