Regarding the issue of prohibiting users
Thread Content
Moderators \Subforum moderators \Administrators all have the authority to ban users. Regarding the issue of restricting users’ actions, if it is feasible for the system to do so, it is recommended to make the following improvement: 1. Once the restriction period expires, the system should automatically lift the restriction. If this cannot be achieved, it is necessary to prevent operators from manually disabling it at that time. This problem exists right now ； 2. After a user’s operation is prohibited, the system should be able to automatically send the reason for the prohibition to the restricted member in PM format. Not all members may disclose their EMAIL addresses; for those whose access has been restricted, sending a PM means they can only find out the reason for the restriction after it is lifted ； 3. Do not hide the historical posts of users who are prohibited from making operations. If it’s banned, it must be because of some violations that occurred recently; previous posts are still useful for the forum. For posts that violate the rules, they can be manually deleted by moderators or otherwise handled. This post was last edited by jieg on 2007-12-22 09:50]
Article 3 supports it; presumably only the site administrator can remove someone； Other actions such as suspensions and bans also result in all of this member’s topics and reply contents becoming unreadable ； It’s very inconvenient. If there are any remarks that threaten the forum, they are usually deleted right away ； So it’s still better to be able to see the content. I don’t understand what J Chao wants to say in points 1 and 2...
For account funds to be deducted, the forum will automatically send a PM to the member whose funds have been deducted to explain the reason. Mute or access restriction actions – the users who are restricted don’t know what’s happening, and there are people in the transaction area discussing this issue.
The number of mute actions should be relatively low. In addition to relying on system settings, it would be best for moderators to create a Haichuan management memo on their own computers, so as to promptly record any operations that may lead to misunderstandings. Point 3 of Article J is reasonable; this approach can also reflect the spirit of being inclusive and tolerant.