HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Pore size distribution of mesoporous materials

2007-12-26View Original

Thread Content

I used the nitrogen adsorption-desorption method to measure the specific surface area and pore size distribution of mesoporous materials, and analyzed adsorption-desorption data from 29 points (11 adsorption measurements). 18 desorptions, relative pressure 0.05–1). When plotting the pore size distribution, pore size is used as the horizontal axis; I’m not sure what to use as the vertical axis. Moreover, the pore size distribution obtained from the software of the testing instrument shows values for V, S, dV, etc., corresponding to 12 different pore sizes: Diameter, Pore Volume, Pore Surface Area, dV(d), dS(d), dV(logd), dS(logd), Area… cc/g, m?g, cc/?g, m??g, cc/g, cc/g: 30.4155, 1.3637e-02, 1.7934e+01, 4.8943e-03, 6.4366e+00, 3.4253e-01, 4.5047e+02, 34.0520, 1.4067e-01, 1.6715e+02, 2.8311e-02, 3.3256e+01, 2.2166e+00, 2.6038e+03, 38.5408, 2.3870e-01, 2.6890e+02, 2.1832e-02, 2.2659e+01, 1.9353e+00, 2.0085e+03, 43.5477, 3.4500e-01, 3.6653e+02, 1.9244e-02, 1.7677e+01, 1.9271e+00, 1.7701e+03, 49.2135, 4.3047e-01, 4.3601e+02, 1.4715e-02, 1.1960e+01, 1.6656e+00, 1.3538e+03, 56.1022, 4.6365e-01, 4.5966e+02, 4.1633e-03, 2.9684e+00, 5.3691e-01, 3.8281e+02, 65.4294, 4.6778e-01, 4.6219e+02, 3.8654e-04, 2.3631e-01, 5.8105e-02, 3.5522e+01, 78.1394, 4.7200e-01, 4.6435e+02, 2.8637e-04, 1.4660e-01, 5.1372e-02, 2.6298e+01, 96.2809, 4.7618e-01, 4.6608e+02, 1.9427e-04, 8.0711e-02, 4.2889e-02, 1.7818e+01, 125.0455, 4.8044e-01, 4.6745e+02, 1.1828e-04, 3.7835e-02, 3.3819e-02, 1.0818e+01, 173.2425, 4.8412e-01, 4.6830e+02, 6.0881e-05, 1.4057e-02, 2.4038e-02, 5.5500e+00, 303.2856, 4.9155e-01, 4.6928e+02, 3.7251e-05, 4.9129e-03, 2.5045e-02, 3.3032e+00. Which set of data should be used as the vertical axis? Is the amount of data for this pore size distribution too small? If more data points are needed, what should be done? Should more adsorption/desorption measurements be taken? Please give me some advice. Thank you.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.