Is it possible to consider changing the current level settings?
Thread Content
Today I did some statistics on the distribution of people at various levels in the forum.: 1st grade of elementary school: 43387 Elementary School 2nd Grade: 9428 Elementary School 3rd grade: 1108 Elementary School 4th grade: 347 Elementary School 5th Grade: Grade 6, 89 Elementary School: 58Junior high school first grade: 29Junior high school 2nd grade: 14 Grade 3 of junior high school: 15High school first grade: 16 High School 2nd Grade: 3Grade 3 of high school: 16 1st grade university: 2nd year of university: 1 Master: 1. There are too many primary schools here, but in reality, most of the people are college graduates, so many members still have opinions about whether they are primary schools. Can you change the level settings, such as: Preschool——————》corresponds to the original 1st grade of elementary school. Elementary school——————》corresponds to the original 2nd grade of elementary school. Junior high school——————》corresponds to the original 3rd grade of elementary school. High school——————》corresponds to the original 4th grade of elementary school. University——————》corresponds to the original 5th grade of elementary school. Bachelor——————”corresponds to the original 6th grade of elementary school Master——————”corresponds to the original The doctor who came from the first year of junior high school——————》corresponds to the original postdoctoral fellow of the second year of junior high school——————》corresponds to the original associate professor of the third year of junior high school——————”corresponds to the original professor of the first year of high school——————”corresponds to the original academician of the second year of high school——————”corresponds to the original lifelong honorary academician of the third year of high school——————”corresponds to the original university level or above __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ For example 2 Cleaner supplement) The difficulty of points in this case is reduced, but because downloading attachments requires wealth, wealth can be used to control the balance. Level Reading permissions Required points New students who have not registered 5 0 First grade of Haichuan Elementary School 10 6 Second grade of Haichuan Elementary School 20 12 Third grade of Haichuan Elementary School 30 30 Fourth grade of Haichuan Elementary School 40 60 Fifth grade of Haichuan Elementary School 50 100 Sixth grade of Haichuan Elementary School 60 150 The first grade of Haichuan Junior High School 70 200 The second grade of Haichuan Junior High School 80 300 The third grade of Haichuan Junior High School 90 400 The first grade of Haichuan High School 110 600 The second grade of Haichuan High School 120 800 The third grade of Haichuan High School 130 1000 One year of Haichuan University 140 1500 The second year of Haichuan University 150 2000 Three years of Haichuan University 160 2500 Haichuan University for four years 170 3000 Haichuan University for five years 180 3500 Master of Haichuan Research Institute 190 5000 PhD of Haichuan Research Institute 200 8000 Professor of Haichuan 251 10000 Strict grading, no over-rating, red envelopes should be given mainly through activities, supplemented by online red envelopes. From now on, the registration system for new students will be trialled and upgraded. 2007-12-30 New students will get 10 charms or 10 points after answering the questions.
You can consider implementing such a system. The cleaners have just lowered the grade difference between second and third grade, so that it will be relatively easy to advance to junior high school. You can change it according to what you said. Junior high school is compulsory education, and it should be relatively easy to upgrade. In this way, graduating from university or getting a master's degree is not out of reach. It's a good suggestion. Would you like to conduct a survey to see everyone's support rate?
I feel that it is unnecessary. It is just a name that needs to be changed. The key is to grasp the scale of the main authority. There is no need to constantly change the name for a nice name, giving people an unstable state! Besides, even changes may not necessarily bring any benefits. Could it be that this will attract more people? What is really needed now are technicians with skills and experience!
You can consider further lowering the requirements for grade 3 or primary school grades to increase the number of members at relevant levels, because the forum is a binary main factor system of charm and wealth. With more power, we can regulate wealth in the future. Let's discuss it. It's time to change it.
I agree with the second floor's opinion. We should conduct a survey and listen to the opinions of the People's Congress. Those who win the hearts and minds of the people will win the world.
I think the level names do not need to be modified, but the upgrade requirements for senior grades can be adjusted appropriately. After all, there are relatively few high-level members in Haichuan now, and the restrictions on upgrade conditions are also a major factor!
I agree with Haiban's plan. Modifying the level is a kind of improvement, but it does not mean that our focus has shifted. Besides, there should be some new atmosphere in the New Year. The most important thing is that this plan is very reasonable.
I found that the number of people counted by Professor Hai is not necessarily correct. My current score is 323 points, and I should be in the first grade of junior high school. The points are arranged in the middle of page 4. Every page shows 50 people, and there are 150 people in the first three pages. I estimated that there are no less than 170 people in the first grade of junior high school and above, but according to Professor Hai's statistics, there are only 87 people! Of course, it is indeed similar to China's national conditions. The majority of the people are poor. There are more than 100,000 people in the forum, and the proportion of people above junior high school is indeed too small! Support reform activities at relevant levels! It is recommended that Haichuan Elementary School should score 20 points for first grade, Haichuan Junior High School should score 50 points for first grade, Haichuan High School should score 100 points for first grade, and Haichuan University should score 200 points for first grade. Masters can also have first and second grades. This post was last edited by chping80 at 2007-12-28 19:00 ]
Professor Hai, please post a discussion thread. Personally, I feel that the name is not very important, but the level points for upgrade are important. It is better to lower the upgrade level as a whole, so that primary school students can be treated as novices, and once they are promoted to junior high school, the requirements will be stricter. It will facilitate classification management.
If you feel it is not necessary, you can also conduct a public opinion survey. Personally, I think you can consider lowering some of the current requirements for junior high schools, high schools, and universities so that everyone can easily upgrade. Now the more you upgrade, the harder it is to upgrade. The difficulty should be about the same. After you go to university, it will be easier to upgrade, and it should be a little harder to take the postgraduate entrance examination: lol, etc.
I think it would be better to appropriately lower the difficulty of upgrading to higher grades. The difficulty of elementary school is already low enough. The reason for such distribution is related to the purpose. From the perspective of data analysis, it is difficult to upload new electronic books, but the depth of technical exchanges has not improved. On the one hand, there is a lack of experienced personnel to reply, and on the other hand, there are a lot of problems in production and design practice, but few are used for communication. In the final analysis, it still has something to do with the fact that most people just ask for information without thinking about sharing it with everyone. There are still few insightful replies on the issues that still exist in technical communication, and as a moderator, the ratings are not timely enough. Maybe the ratings have not been included in the management statistics and the moderators are not enthusiastic about contributing. I wonder why the sample area is so deserted. Why are manufacturers not keen on uploading their own samples without paying anything?
Support the opinion of super moderator fushan. The points system should also be changed, using different points methods for each grade. This makes it easier for lower grades to upgrade.
suggestion: 1. It is recommended not to make corresponding changes for the time being. After all, the original level setting has been for a long time. Any system is a matter of continuity and should not be changed frequently. 2. It is recommended that several targeted feasible plans be put forward on the basis of fully listening to everyone's opinions. Everyone will vote on the several plans, and the revised plan will be determined based on the voting results. 3. Personal suggestions can follow the current level, but the specific point setting can be appropriately adjusted. 4. In any case, the structure of the forum is still better to be pagoda-type, but it is necessary to appropriately increase the proportion of the "middle class" (borrowing the word, no other meaning), which is also in line with * * The scientific outlook on development and relevant requirements for sustainable development proposed.
I agree with the opinions of the above moderators and the grade points can be appropriately lowered.
After seeing the statistical results, I was surprised by the distribution of our personnel structure. The base of the pyramid is too big. Changing level settings is frowned upon. I agree to adjust the differences at all levels based on the current situation so that everyone can upgrade faster. The most important thing is for everyone to change their thinking and increase the rating of ordinary members. As long as it is not malicious, you can get points by actively participating. Don't worry about wealth expansion. Everyone's level is too low. Especially the original poster, many of your followers have provided you with years of hard-earned experience for free, but you don’t even have a rating, which dampens the enthusiasm of the followers and hinders the scoring opportunities of ordinary members. It is recommended that if the poster who asks for help does not actively rate the poster, his points will be deducted.
Support, although it’s just a title, the level setting is really not very reasonable. It feels good, haha
I agree with the original poster’s suggestion, it’s better not to change it. After all, it’s just a fictitious title, and the system still needs to have a certain degree of stability.
personal opinion: I think the purpose of the hierarchy is to encourage everyone to keep working hard, to continuously improve their own quality during the upgrade process, and to enjoy another sense of accomplishment at the same time! Therefore, the levels must be clear and provide an incentive for everyone! But for the current point level system, the situation created is that the first step is difficult to reach the sky - just for ordinary members, (it is easier for the management group to get points, but it takes a lot of effort). After several continuous adjustments, the difficulty of upgrading has been reduced, but it is still difficult to change the difficulty of upgrading. This will inevitably make the "three fires" in a newcomer's heart burn out without being able to reach any level. If it is said that learning * Communication is just a platform, so can we at least get a kind of recognition and encouragement? Continuous upgrading is a quantifiable indicator! ! Therefore, I greatly agree with the proposal of Friends of Haichuan. However, how to divide the specific points and how to quantify them, I think we can mainly make adjustments based on the most basic assumption.: (Continued after dinner)
Post a discussion thread. I personally think that appropriate adjustments can be made. Especially since the number of mid-level members is too small, the policy can be tilted. After all, these members are the backbone of the forum.