Problems with slurry bed and fluidized bed residue hydrogenation technologies
Thread Content
Compared with the fluidized bed residue hydroprocessing technology, which one has greater advantages and higher investment value for residue hydroprocessing in a bubbling bed? Under the same processing capacity, the option with higher investment costs also presents greater operational difficulties.
The biggest drawback of the suspended-bed residue hydroprocessing technology is the issue of handling the residual oil; even with a 90% conversion rate, the 10% remaining residual oil can deter refineries from using this technology, although it can serve as a technical option for future use； The fluidized bed residue hydroprocessing technology requires high investment, but its products can all be utilized, making it suitable for processing low-quality residues.
Since its commissioning in February 2016, our company’s 158,000-ton suspended-bed tar hydrogenation project has been operating stably for three months now. Let’s communicate more on QQ: 22840223