Flow as required, not continuous

2007-12-31View Original

Thread Content

FLOW AS REQ'D NOT CONT Who can help translate this phrase?? Last edited by ship200 on 2008-1-8 19:59 ]

Reply #22007-12-31

It’s FLOW, not follow. FLOW AS REQ’D, NOT CONT – as required, the flow is discontinuous

Reply #32007-12-31

The origin of this sentence is important for translation. Literally, \"echo\" is a suitable translation. As a supplementary note, in professional English, \"flow\" often refers to flowrate. So it is also possible that what is being expressed is: the specified flow rate for intermittent materials.

Reply #42008-07-03

Until a clear source is available, FLOW AS REQ'D NOT CONT should be understood as flow based on requirements rather than a fixed value

Reply #52008-07-04

FLOW AS REQ'D NOT CONT The flow is discontinuous as required

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

Flow as required, not continuous

Thread Content

Related Threads in This Forum

← Previous

Next →

Submit a Project

Disclaimer

Quick Links