revised as indicated & issued for construction
Thread Content
Revised as indicated & issued for construction – how should this be translated? Thank you. This post was last edited by bolinuser on 2008-1-21 at 15:23
Without context, it’s just a note in the diagram.
REVISED AS INDICATED & ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION. Revised as shown and released for construction purposes
I’m impressed; it’s a really good translation.
Petroleum and chemical translation involves many specialized categories, such as processes, equipment, instrument control, products, etc., all of which require the technical expertise of relevant professionals. Moreover, in many cases, the background information provided in the original text is not sufficient, which makes translation somewhat difficult. Sometimes, end-users are also very picky about the quality of the translations. Therefore, producing a translation that satisfies end-users is not an easy task; it requires professionals to provide relevant information in order to improve the quality of the translations together. :handshake :handshake :handshake
REVISED AS INDICATED & ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION. Revised as shown; construction version (manufacturing version)
Professional, impressive :) :handshake
This should be the stamp placed by the owner after reviewing the drawings during the approval process. Issued for construction after modifications according to the annotations
REVISED AS INDICATED A Revised as shown B Revised as indicated :L :L :L
In the absence of a clear context, \"as indicated\" is not used on its own; it is usually followed by a prepositional phrase indicating the location, such as \"in...\", or an adverb like \"above\", etc. I agree with the 8th floor that this is a drawing for approval, so the translation chosen is: Revised as shown in the figure.