How is the coefficient determined for technician bonuses?
Thread Content
The bonus for the technician position is the same as that for the operator position. Is this reasonable? I'm not as tall as the squad leader. How should I work in such a situation? I still have to guide the squad leader's work. Is that possible? Does your unit's bonuses also have this situation?
Our company: Technicians are higher than squad leaders and higher than main posts.
I think it's normal. Technicians don't have as many things to do as monitors.
Maybe the squad leader has also done your work. What the boss recognizes is not the position, but who can solve the problem for him.
The technicians in our company are not as high as the squad leader, but they are higher than the chief operator. The squad leader’s position is equivalent to the deputy director of the workshop, and I personally think: The monitor's responsibilities are much greater than that of the technician. Both in terms of technical theory and practical operation, the monitor must be excellent. Comparatively speaking, technicians are not as good as technicians. The salary level of shift workers in my company is also relatively high because the company pays more attention to practical operations. For an industry with a relatively high risk factor, this may be more reasonable. Hehe, everyone is welcome to comment and criticize.
Our company: The squad leader is higher than the main position, higher than the deputy position, and higher than the technician, unless you are a senior engineer...it is only about the same as the main position: L A Sinopec factory……
The salary of our technicians has been reduced even lower. The boss will think that you work in the office, and the employees will also stare at you. How sad! !
Management is greater than technology. This is a common phenomenon in Chinese enterprises. There is nothing to argue about. After all, management must be an all-rounder, while technology must be a specialist. Just take a look and you will know which one is more powerful.
That's really sad! The technical ones are not as advanced as the operational ones.
In our unit, the technicians have the same salary as the squad leader, but the bonuses are only for the squad leader and the main operator, and the technicians have no share. However, if production is abnormal, in most cases it is the technician who gets scolded, but the squad leader is fine.
Personally, I think the technician's salary should be slightly higher than that of the team leader, respecting the importance of knowledge. Although the technician does not actually operate, he is responsible for the technology of the workshop and guides the operators to operate, so the responsibility is correspondingly greater.
It is normal for technicians to be lower than the monitor. The monitor is the top blue-collar worker, and you are the lowest white-collar worker.
The position of monitor is not easy to hold. I don’t dare to enter the control room now. I am mainly afraid that the boss will see me and think I am idle, so I just walk around the scene. I am always on tenterhooks every day for fear of something happening. If it can be handed over to the next shift safely, it is a victory.
The people upstairs really understand the leader's thoughts, and those with high-ranking officials still look at high-ranking officials.
Definitely unreasonable. The squad leader is responsible for the production of the shift, while the technician is responsible for the entire production, quality, energy and material consumption. The technician's salary should be higher than that of the squad leader.
This depends on your company's view on this issue. If the leader thinks that the technician's job is simpler than that of the monitor (our monitors here are all-rounders), then it is normal to have less work.
Personally, I think the salary of technicians should be slightly higher than that of team leaders. After all, there is a superior-subordinate relationship. Team leaders can be promoted to technicians only when their abilities improve.
For chemical production companies, the role of technicians in production positions is far less important than that of squad leaders, so the salary of squad leaders is naturally higher than that of technicians； But for technical industries such as chemical instrumentation, equipment, and electrical, technicians are more important than team leaders, so they must be treated differently.
I think the squad leader has a relatively large responsibility. Basically, except for the workshop director who occasionally directs production during the day shift, the squad leader is responsible for the rest of the shift. The technician basically has a conveying role and has relatively small responsibilities. The squad leader needs to understand the process and equipment, and the technician is divided into processes and equipment. I don’t know if I understand it correctly.
Technology, what is technology? In fact, mastering technology means mastering how to use tools. Management, what is management, is to give full play to the role of tools. In this way, if you have technical expertise, you are actually a tool. In other words, you are only valuable when you use your efforts. The bonus is not for you to solve the problem, so what should you do? Just stay back! ! Why did you come in and cause trouble? It’s hard for leaders to balance! ! Isn’t that too extreme! ! No way, this is the lesson I learned in practice.
The technician must be higher than the monitor!