Master and apprentice
Thread Content
Nowadays, the human resources of major chemical engineering design institutes are very tight. Since there is a lot of work at hand, the current senior masters are definitely not willing to take apprentices, because the new apprentices do not understand anything. After talking for a long time, it is better to finish the work easily by themselves. Not only that, regarding the personnel arrangement of the project, the general design leader is definitely not willing to let new employees join the project team. It would be okay if the new employees are allowed to do chores. The above matters are mainly designed for craft majors, except for other majors.
It does exist. If I explain it to him, the correction will be completed. I have already completed it, but without the design institute, there will be no successor.
There are also good masters. As long as the apprentice is willing to learn, the master is still willing to teach him.
A lot of it is related to the talent flow situation in the chemical industry. Talents trained by design institutes may be quickly poached by other engineering companies. At the same time, many graduates are now too demanding, resulting in many masters being unwilling to take on novices!
Alas, I am also studying crafts. I don’t know what I will do in the future. I will go to a factory or a design institute. . .
All young people have to do is maintain a good attitude
This is a problem with our mechanism. Our unit has a pilot system in which new apprentices receive a fixed salary. The master who participates in the project does not receive project bonuses and works with his apprentices and receives project bonuses. After two years of training, he basically works alone and receives bonuses. The advantage of this is that the master no longer teaches you step by step and can only answer questions.: The master is not afraid that the apprentice will get a bonus for working hard. On the contrary, the more the apprentice can do, the easier it will be for the master. This prevents the master from not teaching his disciples a guaranteed fixed salary (still a good salary just after graduating), avoids not being able to learn anything, and also makes them feel promising when they are busy. shortcoming: There is nothing you can do when you encounter apprentices who cannot hold up the wall and masters who are not high-level, but I think at least this method can lead the apprentice on the road and lead him through the door. As for whether you can become a talented person or not, there is still a question. The master will lead you in. Cultivation depends on the individual.
As long as the newcomer is willing to learn, someone will still guide him. We clearly need someone to lead new people.
This is indeed the case now, it is still difficult to advance in design...
The salary is very low and it’s hard to get a job, which is really depressing. :L
I am about to graduate and prepare to enter a design school, but I don’t know what to do yet. Why!
Whether you can arrange a good master is a matter of luck. Having a good master is of course the best thing. But if a master is in trouble or the master refuses to hand over, it is definitely not the reason for his incompetence. In the design institute, there are a lot of old materials and books. How much you learn depends entirely on your own understanding.
This cannot be generalized. The key depends on your own processing ability and your usual work performance. Generally, in the same department, it is impossible to not teach at all!
Mainly in the apprenticeship, as the saying goes: The master leads you in, and you rely on yourself to practice. As long as the apprentice makes progress on his own and the master just gives instructions, it shouldn't increase his energy much. Of course, since the master has put in the effort, he should be rewarded.
Which unit is this elder brother in?
Agreed, only when you have value and can become a helper will others be willing to help you.
It’s not that the master doesn’t want to teach, it’s mainly that the apprentice doesn’t want to learn. The apprentice who is willing to learn is also very happy to teach. Even if it means teaching him step by step, he is happy to do so, so he’d better be an apprentice who is willing to learn.
The company pays the master to take the apprentice, haha, that’s what our company is like!
Indeed, this society requires young people to be practical and willing to learn. After all, it is the master who leads the way, and cultivation depends on the individual!
This is also due to the impatience of our young people. If you are unable to do things in a down-to-earth manner, that master is willing to guide you.
It’s not that the master doesn’t want to teach, it’s mainly that the apprentice doesn’t want to learn. The apprentice should have a good relationship with the master