Discussion on zoning plan for industrial control\electrical area

A. If the shared engineering supporting (auxiliary) majors are not separated next year, they will still be in the technical exchange area of ​​various industries and the engineering technology exchange area.:   Then the current industrial control version area can remain unchanged, and the following data areas can be divided into 3 areas.: Electrical/electronic control data area, automatic control data area, DCS/PLC control system data area B. If these majors are to be placed in a separate communication area next year:   It is recommended to divide into two electrical/electronic control board areas, with a data area for automatic control boards, an automatic control data area, and a DCS/PLC control system data area. In chemical engineering design institutes or chemical plants, the distinction between electrical and instrumentation is still very obvious. ； The reason why it is recommended that the data area of ​​control systems such as DCS/PLC be independent is because it already accounts for 1/6 of the data (including those that are merged) ； And this kind of information is generally relatively difficult to obtain.       The specific name can be determined again.     chemicaleng2008 lecturer's proposal: http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-134992-1-1.html  Establish a communication area for typical self-control cases Personal views: You can first open a discussion thread on the topic of self-control case exchange, or even keep it pinned to the top for a few days to see if there are many people participating. ； Depends on the effect. I have previously pinned discussion posts on the topic of flow instruments, discussion posts on liquid level (interface) instruments, automatic control design skills, experience exchange posts, etc. The results were very poor and had to be cancelled.   This post was last edited by Icetide on 2008-1-6 15:35 ]

The current industrial control version area needs to be standardized. I think it is mainly because a reasonable division of labor framework has not been established. You can follow ICETIDE's suggestion to make a transition first, and then divide it into more detailed frameworks when the time is ripe. Such as electrical and power section, instrumentation section, DCS/PLC section, industrial control section (including industrial and automatic control case exchange), etc. If you want to recruit more professional people to join, you must first have a relatively good communication environment. I think now is the time.