HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

On the design of spiral plate heat exchangers and HTRI5.0

2008-01-07View Original

Thread Content

I don’t know how to design spiral plate heat exchangers; I’ve heard that HTRI5.0 can be used for this purpose. I’m not sure where I can download HTRI5.0 I feel that my own design isn’t right; I want to try using software for it. I was wondering if anyone knows what software can be used to calculate spiral plate heat exchangers? Thank you for the advice!
Reply #22008-01-10
I happened to come across discussions on the calculation of this type of heat exchanger in a chemical engineering forum. The relevant views are as follows: “HTRI5.0 can perform calculations for spiral plate heat exchangers.” “As of HTRI5.0, only Type I spiral plate heat exchangers can be calculated; Types II and III cannot yet be calculated.” “When used to calculate spiral plate heat exchangers, HTRI5.0 yields inaccurate results, and the software itself indicates this in the warning bar (this program has not been validated by the HTRI subsidiary).””
Reply #32008-01-10
Indeed, the Chemical Engineering Technology Forum discusses this issue in much greater detail than HaiChuan, and it also provides more comprehensive information.
Reply #42008-01-10
Forums that were established early still have a solid foundation. By the way, are all those types of heat exchangers actually in use?
Reply #52008-01-16
LTY, hehe, you’re quite careful indeed. Regarding heat exchangers, it seems like not many people on the forum actively discuss this topic; it’s usually you and Micro who reply to my posts. The questions I ask are those I encounter in my actual work, which is why I ask them. Moreover, those heat exchangers are ones that are actually used in practice, or sometimes their design is similar to certain types – for example, the BXU-type heat exchanger. In reality, it’s not exactly a BXU, but in the software, no other type of heat exchanger matches the characteristics of a two-pass BXU as well, which is why we choose BXU. A two-pass design is necessary; sometimes I just want to find some basis in the software to feel more confident. I haven’t been working on heat exchangers much lately, nor have I looked at Aspen simulations for quite some time. Sometimes I feel too busy and don’t have time, but time can always be found if one tries hard enough. As everyone knows, when it comes to actually doing the work, not many people are able to do it.:victory: Keep studying hard! Wish everyone progress together! I said a few extra words; I was nagging. . . .
Reply #62008-01-16
Hehe, you’ve caused everyone a lot of trouble; it was such a hassle. I learn a lot from every exchange; even when I think I already understand something, there is always something new to gain after the conversation. \"Learning is endless\" really means that. I am also grateful to high-level teachers like Micro who selflessly answer our questions.
Reply #72008-01-17
:Lol, please don’t wrong me – every question I ask is targeted and useful for work. Hehe, I’m also very grateful for everyone’s enthusiastic help and active communication.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.