Thread Content
Subject taken: Professional Knowledge Exam (Part 1) – Score: 78. Subject taken: Professional Knowledge Exam (Part 2) – Score: 62. Subject taken: Professional Case Study Exam (Part 1) – Score: 36. Subject taken: Professional Case Study Exam (Part 2) – Score: 30
The bitterness of it can only be understood by those who experience it. Why not write it down, to leave some memories for oneself and some lessons for those who come after! Join our 2014 work summary session, which is combined with an exam. There’s still a chance to win big prizes. http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-1358636-1-1.html
In the afternoon, I got the same score as myself; 36 in the morning and 30 in the afternoon :D
:) Octanoic acid – only you know best; congratulations to the original poster. On the second day, 34 up and 24 down. Sadness. Let’s fight again another day.
After twenty years of diligent study, I finally achieved my goal!
Yellow version, you seem a bit like Fan Jin after passing the imperial exams
Congratulations, hope to share successful experiences.
Hello, I’d like to ask a question to my seniors. Is the professional work certificate issued by your design institute? Will the certificates issued by ordinary chemical companies pass the review? Looking forward to your reply.
Among the many candidates, I am relatively older. The difficulties encountered can be imagined. I remember in 2013, when I took the exam for the first time, I saw a woman around my age who came out of the examination room crying bitterly; it really moved me at that time. That time, it was 118 for professional knowledge and 60 for professional cases. Later, upon analyzing the reasons for my failure, I realized that the reference book I used for preparation had misled me with its title; it actually covered basic professional knowledge and was meant for the basic professional exam. After reflecting on the pain, I made up my mind to give it one more year. In 2014, the professional case exam was indeed quite difficult. After the first session ended and the bell rang, there was an outcry from all sides; statements like “see you next year” echoed in my ears nonstop. Over those two days, it was more exhausting than any exam I had taken during my youth, whether it was the college entrance exam or the graduate school entrance exam. Compared to the 2011 exam questions, the difficulty level is similar; however, the questions now have more of an engineering practice context. Of course, there remains the commonly criticized issue of having few questions related to unit operations in chemical engineering, while there are many questions pertaining to thermodynamics. At the end of the year, **proposed policies aimed at tightening the management of professional qualifications and phasing out certain certificates. This inadvertently reduced the likelihood of leniency in evaluations. Going against the trend, this move made most candidates like me—whose estimated scores based on professional case analyses hover around the passing mark—break out in a cold sweat once again. Yesterday, when I learned that it was possible to check one’s scores, I felt anxious; I decided to check them right away, rather than waiting until no one was at home. The mix of anticipation and fear I felt is something that those many people whose exams are taking place in just a few days cannot understand. Fortunately, this was back in 2014. Summarizing my own experience, it comes down to words that everyone understands: maintain the right mindset, start early, stay calm, and remain persistent.
As for providing professional certification, as long as you want to participate, it’s no problem at all. It is advisable to have a design institute issue certificates for both the professional foundation and the professional examinations; this would probably be better.