Thread Content
I heard that China Chemical Industry News reported that* * The National Development and Reform Commission requires that the localization rate of equipment for large-scale petrochemical projects should reach 75% in the future. Is this true? The question is whether this is a mandatory requirement. If so, we must pay attention to it in engineering projects. This post was last edited by zxz017 on 2008-1-10 15:31 ]
The 600,000-ton PTA project in Fuling, Sichuan already requires 100%, and it is estimated that the same is true for the 1 million-ton PTA project in Yizheng.
Indeed. Support domestic products! :lol
Sorry, I made a mistake. Please delete this duplicate post. Other friends please do not post.
It may be a goal, but it seems difficult to achieve. Many rotating equipment need to be imported. In this regard, the gap between us and foreign countries should be relatively large.
In fact, many equipments are currently made well in China and localization is supported~:victory:
Thank you all for your active participation. I found a relevant statement and would like to share it with you. * * The National Development and Reform Commission issued the "Implementation Plan on Accelerating the Autonomization of Large-Scale Petrochemical Equipment". During the "Eleventh Five-Year Plan" period, the focus of the autonomy of large-scale petrochemical equipment is million-ton ethylene and deep processing complete sets, 600,000-1 million ton PTA complete sets, natural gas long-distance pipeline complete sets, 10-million-ton refining DCS systems and large aromatics complete sets. Among them, calculated based on the ratio of the value of equipment with independent property rights to the total equipment investment, the autonomy rate of the first three complete sets of equipment must reach more than 75%. By the end of the "Eleventh Five-Year Plan", large-scale petrochemical equipment will basically be designed and manufactured domestically. Please see the following web page for details: http://chinaneast. * nhuanet.com/jszb/2007-12/26/content_12045208.htm