There is a big discussion about the overflow of ratings in the forum!

I just discussed this issue with Wenxin Chaoban, Maomu Comb RMM and others in the group. They all agreed that this issue should be taken seriously. I hope everyone can express their opinions together to promote the development of the forum!

1. One red envelope is enough. More and less have the same effect, but one will reduce customer flow. 2. The intensity of bonus points can be increased to encourage discussion. The amount of bonus points can effectively guide the direction and participation. 3. As for the members of the technical team, it is better to have fewer people than too many. More people may not necessarily lead to higher efficiency. 4. There are differences in the scoring measures of each area. For example, in the petrochemical information area where I am located, I feel that the posts are good and provide more wealth, but they rarely add charm.   In addition, I would like to ask my comrades, how do you control the charm increase? After all, the member's charm increases faster, and the upgrade is faster.

What is the purpose of rating? It is an affirmation of the efforts of the members.； Of course, some random comments cannot be ruled out, but I think the general direction of development is acceptable. The general psychology of people is that after receiving recognition from others, their enthusiasm will increase, and what we need is this kind of result. Why should we dispel the general enthusiasm for the sake of individual mischief?

1\Reduce the number of daily red envelopes and just value them randomly. For example, the random value is: 1--3 wealth. my opinion: The red envelope is designed to mobilize the enthusiasm of members. If the value is reduced to 1-3, I think the enthusiasm of members may drop by 20%. 2\Remove some members of the technical team. my opinion: There are not many technical members now, so why do we need to eliminate them? We should guide them correctly and improve their enthusiasm instead of attacking members who perform poorly. It is very beneficial to the development of the forum to increase the exchanges between technical members. 3\Increase the rating authority. Reduce the rating amount. my opinion: This article runs counter to the thoughts of the administrators, which is to let everyone participate in scoring and manage the forum together. It’s just that the rating amount should be given a range value, such as sharing a book, up to 20 wealth, 5 charm, and only a maximum of 2 people are allowed to rate, etc.! This post was last posted by * ou * Edited by ngzhe on 2008-1-10 21:51 ]

The above is indeed reasonable, but it is just considered from different angles. The opinions and concerns of the original poster can be considered. I fully agree with the second discussion of the original poster, and I have no objection to 1.3.

When I give higher scores, I usually consider the technical content of the post, the depth of the discussion, the perspective of the poster, and the strength of the post. So far, I have deducted points from two people.

I think this can be implemented: 1. The amount of forum red envelopes can be adjusted appropriately.: 1~5 wealth every day, random value ； 2. The technical team should indeed be updated and evaluation should be strengthened. At the same time, the technical team should be leading in technology. In the future, the best candidates can be selected based on personal wishes in forum competitions. ； 3. If you think that the wealth of the forum is expanding too fast, the personal rating can be canceled at the appropriate time. 4. Rating of moderators: Nowadays, forums post random posts, many of which are repetitive and without any introduction. Now that there are no upgrade exams when new members come in, there will be irregularities in posting.: Now this version will no longer be graded, and penalties will be implemented in the future. Duplicate posts will only be moved to the recycle bin and will be punished in the future.

:lol I think appropriate control is possible, but it cannot discourage most people! I saw the post is really good, I can give you more points! If you control it to death, you have no right to increase it if you want!

On the contrary, I think we should increase the intensity of ratings. As for the overflow of ratings, to put it bluntly, most of them are concentrated on senior members. Think about what ordinary members rely on to upgrade. You can't just expect to receive red envelopes. The reason why ordinary members can be rated is not to upload information, but to help people solve problems or initiate issues. These are all supports for the construction of the forum. Why can't there be more points and more encouragement? Let’s take a look at how many ordinary members in your section have uploaded information and solved problems without being rated? And who are the people with more than a dozen rating records under one post? ! ! ! Do you still want junior members to account for 80~90% of the members? We members of the management team receive red envelopes every day and wages at the end of the month. A well-fed man does not know that a hungry man is hungry! ! ! Are we so afraid that ordinary members will upgrade too quickly? Do all members really need to follow the path of technical team members to upgrade quickly?   Today I also rated a post about bulk filler calculation software that was uploaded in March 2007, and I was the first to rate it. If it weren’t for the fact that I needed this software to search for it, I would have to wait for the next searcher to add points! Although I may have crossed the line in rating, I still rated it to the best of my ability, because if I were this member, I might not have the motivation to upload materials anymore!   I suggest members of the management team to do a general cleaning. As long as there are no duplicate posts, go through the posts in their own section and rate all the posts that deserve the rating! ! !   This post was last edited by Bush on 2008-1-11 14:24 ]

The right to rate cannot be cancelled. This is everyone’s right and the characteristic of Haichuan, which should be preserved and promoted. As for the proliferation of ratings, other methods can be considered to control it, and the rating function should not be cancelled.

1. Really reduce the amount of red envelopes you can receive. Another 500 is enough, not too many!   2. The members of the technical team should be able to move up and down. If they are not qualified, they will be removed. There are excellent managers and technical team members who can be recommended.   3. The right to score cannot be cancelled. It is everyone's right. The score limit can be appropriately limited. In addition, the wealth limit of the essence downloadable data can be increased as needed. This post was last edited by tianleikkk on 2008-1-11 21:49 ]

    In 2008, the focus of the forum was not on the sharing of materials but on encouraging technical exchanges and active discussions. Therefore, I think that posts that actively participate in discussions and help others should be rated more intensively. This is the key to the development of the forum. If it is only a data download site, it might as well be changed to an ordinary download website. Since it is a forum, there must be requests, responses, discussions, and exchanges. Of course, there should also be increased control and punishment for random comments, duplication, irrigation and other phenomena. Based on my recent experience and the experience of several activities I participated in, I have discovered several issues that require the management team to pay special attention to.: 1. The issue of mutual grading by the same IP should be firmly resisted. (Although it may affect some innocent people, it is better to kill a hundred by mistake than to let one go) 2. The same IP answers questions repeatedly and participates in activities repeatedly to get mixed points. 3. The same topic or attachment is posted in N topics. Not only does it increase the workload of the moderator, but it also causes inconvenience to other people’s normal browsing.       This post was last edited by iamsunyue on 2008-1-13 22:22 ]

I think it should be handled according to the specific circumstances of each edition.        In some individual sections, the forum's popularity is not ideal. The average number of posts per day does not exceed 20, and the minimum is about 10 posts. Except for some water posts and meaningless help posts, there are only a handful of meaningful posts. At this time, I can't bear to give a rating. Not only should these forums not lower their ratings, but they should also find more effective ways to increase the activity of these sections. Some of the more active sections have an average of about 100 posts per day. In such places, I think the rating can be adjusted appropriately. I don't think it will have much impact on the activity level of the forum.        I have just joined the forum management, and I have not yet fully understood the forum’s management methods and systems. I hope all Oceanpower managers can correct me. This post was last written by c_m_Edited by 1979 at 2008-2-18 18:24 ]

What are the requirements for becoming a member of the technical team? What kind of technical member are you?

My personal point of view is that we should consider this issue from the perspective of others. Regarding scoring, I suggest that we continue to maintain the current scoring system. At the same time, we should increase the corresponding activities of the forum and use wealth to attract everyone's participation. Only when more people participate can the forum achieve greater development.

I personally think that the proliferation of ratings cannot be prevented by the method you mentioned! In fact, as long as you register, it will definitely be useful to our forum and make a certain contribution to the development of the forum. Of course, learn in our forum * While improving, I am also willing to contribute to the construction of the forum. Improve supervision and make rewards and punishments clear, so that everyone will be convinced! ! This post was last edited by Bincheng Watcher on 2008-2-19 19:25 ]

The threshold for joining the technical team members should be raised and they should be evaluated regularly! Now the technical team is really a mixed bag. Academic forums rely on technical discussions, which is the backbone!

In fact, the daily red envelope of 5 wealth is not too much, so it is better to control the rating. Some posts have no rating value, but they actually add wealth and charm, and there are quite a lot of them. This is suspected of speculation, and this should be taken care of.

Let’s take a look at how many ordinary members in your section have uploaded information and solved problems without being rated? And who are the people with more than a dozen rating records under one post? ! ! ! Feel the same! !