HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Chlorine liquid ring compressor

2008-01-11View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by sunjl1981 on 2013-1-6 at 23:41. Experts, please share some tips regarding precautions when using chlorine liquid ring compressors. # , , &
Reply #22008-01-12
Medium: sulfuric acid. The flow of liquid must not be interrupted during operation. The sulfuric acid concentration should be above 95%. At startup, the outlet should be fully open while the inlet is preferably kept slightly open, as this helps to prevent the formation of a liquid ring
Reply #32008-01-12
I’m not an expert, but I’d like to discuss this: currently, there is a trend toward replacing liquid ring chlorine compressors with smaller turbines. The original poster might want to pay more attention to this issue, as liquid ring chlorine compressors have very high energy consumption
Reply #42008-01-12
Indeed, current liquid ring chlorine compressors have very high energy consumption, and the initial investment required is also substantial. Small turbines are a good option; however, if the company has the funds, it can opt for 3K models instead.
Reply #52008-01-12
Currently, there are two types of chlorine delivery equipment: one is the liquid ring pump, and the other is the centrifugal compressor. Vane pumps have modest requirements regarding the moisture content of chlorine gas, but they consume a lot of energy, have a low flow rate, and produce low pressure at the outlet; they are suitable for transporting chlorine gas in production facilities with an alkali production capacity of less than 50,000 tons per year. Centrifugal compressors have advantages such as high flow rate, high discharge pressure, stable operation, and the ability to improve the working environment
Reply #62008-01-12
Personally, I think a liquid ring chlorine compressor is better, because 1. it offers greater operational flexibility. 2. Relatively durable. 3. The device is easy to operate
Reply #72008-01-15
With different opinions from various sectors, as times change and society develops, we shouldn’t stop making progress just because something is simple to operate. Besides, liquid ring pumps consume too much electricity
Reply #82008-01-17
The opinions from the 5th floor are quite practical; I tend to agree with them
Reply #92008-01-17
1. Control the sulfuric acid concentration properly. 2. The mechanical seal protection nitrogen is kept in the on position to prevent damage to the mechanical seal.
Reply #102008-01-17
I disagree; simple designs are generally reliable, but energy consumption is a major issue. It would be best to have designs that are both simple and energy-efficient... The chemical equipment industry needs to make more efforts!!!

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.