Thread Content
There are 2 questions regarding the technical specifications that I would like everyone’s feedback on: 1. In the table of technical specifications, there is a field for the working medium; can I fill it in with the name of the material instead? 2. Is there a difference between \"steam\" and \"vapor\"? I filled in the latter in both cases, but my supervisor insisted that I was wrong. :(
It’s right for leaders to set strict requirements. :Lol, the entries in the technical specifications section should be standardized and not changed arbitrarily. In most cases, the terms \"process medium\" and \"material name\" have similar meanings, but the former is more appropriate. Steam generally refers to water vapor, whereas if it isn’t specified, it’s impossible to determine what type of vapor it is: lol. Personal opinion, for reference only!
The layout should be standardized; otherwise, outsiders will think that management is chaotic. We used to do it the same way – anyone could fill in the forms as they wished – and it became unattractive to look at over time.
You agree with strict requirements; how then is it more appropriate to refer to the working medium as a process medium? Anyway, thank you for getting back to me so quickly.:handshake
The drawings I’ve seen either list the material name, the medium, or the name of the medium; they should all refer to the same thing.
Sorry, it’s usually a working medium; it was a typo. :lol
The units in the technical specifications table are all standardized
What was said on the 2nd floor is correct; it should be written according to unified rules, otherwise things will get chaotic
Although the working medium and the filling material are similar, it is better to use the former according to the standards; When designing pressure vessels, manufacturers will specify this in the technical specifications: as for the difference between steam and vapor, vapor generally refers to the transformation from a solid state to a gas state ; Steam has always been in a gaseous state; it is not formed through transformation. This is my personal opinion for reference only