Which company within Sinochem Construction has the strongest capabilities?

At present, the quality of chemical construction companies varies. I have compared companies such as 11th Chemical Construction Company, 3rd Chemical Construction Company, 10th Chemical Construction Company, 9th Chemical Construction Company, and CNPC 6th Construction Company. For projects involving styrene, 11th Chemical Construction Company, 10th Chemical Construction Company, and CNPC 6th Construction Company are the best choices, as they have relevant experience and a good reputation.:victory: This post was last edited by guozongduan on 2008-8-6 21:48.]

Choose Sinopec’s Company 2, Company 3, Company 4, Company 5, and Company 10; these companies are stronger than Huajian.

The several construction companies under Sinopec are indeed stronger than those under Sinochem’s head office. However, they have been extremely busy these years, and their main resources are not available for projects like yours. Moreover, their quotes are generally higher than those of Sinochem’s units. Additionally, even when they get a project, they subcontract it, so it’s better to have Huajian handle the work for you properly. The companies involved in the production of styrene at Yangzi BASF are Sihua Construction and the current Company 5; they have done a good job, so it worth considering them ； As for the chemical construction sector, those that have undergone restructuring have done so, while those that have failed have simply lost all their strength. :(

It is recommended to engage in bidding competition among the construction companies such as Sanhua Jian, Baha Jian, Shihua Jian, Jiuhua Jian, Shiyi Hua Jian; generally, the quotes from the construction companies under Sinopec are higher than those from the companies under Sinochem.

Sinopec is okay. It depends on which party is the owner and which party is the general contractor

Winning bids at low prices leads to continuous problems, difficulty in management, numerous claims, poor quality – it’s not worth it! ! ! !

Still, some of Sinopec’s construction units have more standardized management.

I just inspected a project carried out by Sinochem Second Construction a couple of days ago; the infrastructure there wasn’t even complete. The project manager was quite capable, but as for the quality of construction and safety standards, it’s hard to say anything positive! ! ! ! Never use it.

The companies under Sinopec and those in the chemical construction sector are both fine! It’s just that Sinopec’s companies have more advanced construction equipment. The construction management and techniques are similar in both cases. On the other hand, I feel that those companies in the chemical construction sector may have a stronger sense of service – especially those that have been restructured

As one of the members in the chemical engineering construction industry, I really don’t want to discuss which companies are better or worse. In my opinion, both Sinopec’s construction units and Sinochem’s construction units have undertaken large-scale petrochemical construction projects and possess experience in managing such large-scale constructions; each has its own strengths and advantages. Of course, Sinopec’s construction companies generally have better equipment, especially when it comes to large-scale lifting equipment, but professional lifting companies also have very strong equipment, and all construction companies can rent it. What matters most in construction is the level of attention given to a project by the leadership of the company handling it, particularly the project manager. Some clients specify a particular project manager during negotiations, otherwise they refuse to award the project； Another factor to consider is the staffing level that the construction company assigns to a project. Often, some construction companies face difficulties in staffing certain projects due to an excessive workload, which can have negative consequences. Therefore, it is essential to understand the current workload of the construction company at the time of bidding, as well as whether your project is considered one of its priority projects (in terms of scale, technical complexity, social impact, etc.). In my opinion, as long as a project is among a construction company’s priority projects, any construction company such as Sinopec or Sinochem will be able to carry out the work successfully. The project quality is guaranteed. This is my personal opinion, for your reference only. This post was last edited by zhao*rong on 2008-1-25 22:48]

For such large-scale projects, it’s not feasible to have just one organization handle them; it’s better to divide the project into several sections and issue tenders for them, selecting several construction companies to carry out the work. This approach helps to reduce costs, accelerate the completion timeline, and also allows for comparison among different companies, thereby fostering mutual improvement!

The chemical industry is now regarded as an industry with huge profits; no matter which company or construction firm you choose, as long as you have the money, it’s possible to get whatever result you want. Most of these construction companies originate from Jilin Chemical Construction or were developed separately. There isn’t much difference between using one company or another. It’s quite difficult to find a good company among these chemical construction firms. Perhaps the project should be divided into several sections so that different companies can submit bids first – after all, a company’s past performance and achievements don’t tell you much (this is purely my personal opinion)

Go to Nanjing or Shanghai, and check out the chemical industrial zones in Ningbo. The key is the reputation of the project manager; finding a good one should not be a problem

If it’s not subcontracted, both chemical construction and petrochemical construction companies can deliver satisfactory results. However, subcontracting is a serious issue these days, and the project manager system is now in place. The quality of the work is highly dependent on the project manager. Therefore, when making a choice, consider the following points: 1) Companies with strong capabilities and a good reputation; 2) Project managers who are well-versed in the project; 3) A policy that explicitly prohibits subcontracting; 4) The price should not be artificially lowered – you get what you pay for; 5) Choose a good supervision company

It is still recommended to use Sinopec’s construction company. The project cost might be higher, but the quality of their work and their on-site management are better than those of Hua Jian. When it comes to construction, quality is crucial! I recommend Sinopec Company 10!

The “Chemical Construction Company” mentioned above is likely to be the “China National Chemical Engineering Group Corporation” these days; if that’s the case, then where are the Eighth Chemical Construction Company and the Tenth Chemical Construction Company?

It should be evaluated in a comprehensive and objective manner.

Ba Hua Jian and Shi Hua Jian originally belonged to the chemical construction sector; later, after the establishment of Sinopec Group, several chemical construction companies joined Sinopec’s system, and Shi Hua Jian was renamed Sinopec’s Fourth Construction Company； Bahua Jian is a construction company affiliated with Sinopec Nanhua Group; it was restructured at the end of 2007 and is now known as Nanjing Nanhua Construction Co., Ltd. As you mentioned, the chemical construction sector no longer has the terms \"Eight Chemical Construction Units\" and \"Ten Chemical Construction Units\", but many organizations still refer to those units as such.

I’ve been in contact with Company 10 and Company 2; I think each of them has its own characteristics, and both are quite good, haha

Those who have worked with Erhua Jian and Sanhua Jian feel that Erhua Jian’s overall quality is inferior to that of Sanhua Jian.