Thread Content
The forum now has more than 100,000 members (based on the number of registrations), but the actual number of members (who come back often or not often) is not that many. There are also people who registered before but have forgotten how to log in again. Register again, or register multiple accounts per person. This has nothing to do with seafarers, and requirements may gradually increase for Haichuan's servers. The administrator has started the auction and processing of UIDs that have not been logged in for a long time. Based on the above, it is proposed to adjust the overall UID number of Haichuan: That is, set it to UID1~30 and set it as the management group member area. ; UID31~100, engineer level and above ; The group with UID 5000 or above is the starting group, and the overall order will be compiled based on the registration and login time of Haichuan. The sorting time is every year (one week before the end of the new year, the member login modification function is suspended for sorting). Compiled number of Haichuan members. Only the UID number is adjusted, and the others remain unchanged. UID numbers that have been sold (originally belonging to the small account area) can be set as honorary members. After hard work, Haichuan has formed its own style and popularity. In the future, it will develop based on its strength. As for the false reputation, it does not need to be shown by the empty number of registrations. Regarding the above opinions, everyone is welcome to give their opinions and hope that they can be improved and implemented.
I support the original poster's opinion. However, the workload and difficulty are relatively large. I guess Dada people will be busy for a while if they do this... :victory:
Good idea, but the workload is a bit heavy
Sigh, there are more than 100,000 members. If we really want to organize it like this, the moderators will not do anything else for a month. . . I agree to clean up IDs that have not been logged in for a long time, but it is not necessary to adjust UIDs on such a large scale.
The workload is heavy, I wonder if the poster has a good idea to try?
Even the management team has personnel changes, some have resigned, some have been dismissed due to insufficient performance, and some have applied or been recommended to join the management team. Therefore, the personnel changes are large and there is no need to divide the UIDs. The administrators are already working on cleaning up the accounts in an orderly manner.
Huawei has broken the stereotype of judging positions based on job number* , we just need to go back and implement it. And this method is indeed too formal and not flexible enough. The workload is too much.
For UID numbers, don’t think about major changes. The technical risks are very high.
If you have nothing to do, how much impact will this have on the forum? An unrealistic idea!
Let’s change it when it’s technically feasible.