three questions

Sinoeng's suggestion is very good. Now some sections only have 2 moderators, but the number of posts per day is more than 100. The workload of the moderators can be imagined. If one of the moderators is busy, the work pressure of the other one will be very high. You may wish to consider increasing the number of moderators of sections with a large volume of posts to about 4 to 5 people. This will make the management load more reasonable, and the moderators can also have the energy to participate in technical discussions in addition to management.

Engineer Sino's first question touched my heart. Great support! What do you mean by "exclusion" in the second question? As far as I know, when you delete the post, the wealth and charm you commented on should also be removed at the same time.

“The word "exclude" was wrong, it should be "deduct", it has been corrected, thank you!

Indeed, Haichuan's management strength is now a bit weak compared to the development speed of the forum. Some veteran managers have retired. In addition, new sections are gradually increasing. More people of insight need to be invested so that the forum can develop better! The Chinese New Year is almost here, and I sincerely hope that the 2008 of the forum will be even more exciting!

It is recommended to select more engineers from the technical team members. There are currently a few engineers, and then select some moderators from the engineers to get started faster.

We pay attention to our obligations when working as moderators, and we will work hard to be good moderators!

When a post is deleted, all its ratings will be deleted as well. Regardless of whether you gave positive points or deducted negative points, they will be automatically cleared. Therefore, posts with negative ratings are generally not deleted but only moved to the recycle bin. And delete the attachments to avoid taking up forum space.

Judging from the current forum management, leaders, and technical team members, there are already many, not few, but how to improve their enthusiasm. , not only by increasing the salary gap between Bamboo and technical team members and engineers, but also by taking more effective means to involve them in management and technical support.

       Question one: I think the members of the technical team will formulate corresponding rules, just like the P-value assessment mentioned by Friends of Haichuan. If the standard is not met, no salary will be given, another warning for failure, and two downgrades! First of all, you will receive red envelopes every day you go online, and you will receive red envelopes if you actively participate. The monthly salary should not be too much. To curb inflation, we must first start with the managers and technical team members!         Question 2: The issue of duplicate posts depends on the situation. If the previous topic posts have been sorted out and introduced in detail, you can consider merging them. If the previous posts are not standardized, you can consider deleting the old posts. It does not require who comes first, but who is more reasonable and standardized! Of course, if it is just a simple duplicate, delete it!     Happy New Year, I am very happy to have so many like-minded friends in Haichuan! I wish everyone’s dreams come true and reach a higher level! This post was last edited by tianleikkk on 2008-1-18 19:33 ]

I agree with what the 10th floor said. As for whether we should ask the cleaners to come up with a more reasonable regulation on mergers and retention on the basis of merit, everyone should follow the regulations more uniformly, and it is less likely to cause misunderstandings and disputes.

Regarding the first question, I agree with you with both hands! Enrich the Bamboo team and promote some of the better technical team members to Bamboo through recommendations from Bamboo. For the second question. A little different view. Analyze specific situations in detail. If the content of the duplicate post is better and the rating is better, do not revoke the rating. ； If the content is average and the score is high, some of the scores will be revoked and some of the scores will be retained as appropriate.

I will also talk about how to deal with duplicate posts.: First of all, I agree with the liuze78 moderator’s point of view.: Don’t just make a one-size-fits-all approach, but treat it on a case-by-case basis. However, there are many principles for judging duplicate posts, such as the order of publication time, the quality of posts, etc., and sometimes there are conflicts. Want to emphasize something: When it is difficult to identify duplicate posts, it is recommended to merge similar subjects, stick to the best attachments, delete other attachments, and retain the original score. If you encounter a situation where you have to transfer it to the recycle bin, say a few more words to explain the situation to the author.

My opinion on handling duplicate posts: Those with the same name but different editions, languages, and formats (such as word, pdf, etc.) are not considered duplicates. Only the earlier posts should be retained if they are completely consistent. Otherwise, relatively complete posts should be retained. For example, standards with written explanations should be retained, but invalid standards should be cleared. This post was last edited by zyy1311 on 2008-1-19 22:37 ]

Seeing that everyone is so actively participating, I would like to express some opinions: 1. Let some engineers and technical team members also have management functions (the same functions as moderators), which can ease the work of moderators to a great extent. (The selection of these people depends on recommendation and assessment) 2. Arrange the management team reasonably. Now that there are so many technical team members and moderators, can a tree-type management team be formed. If this is the case, management will not be chaotic. 3. Training of the management team. Everyone knows the difference between amateurs and professionals. That is systematic training and regular training, which can train the managers’ own abilities and contribute to the development of the forum.* * Good. This post was last written by * ou * Edited by ngzhe on 2008-1-20 19:43 ]