Is the methanol and downstream product exchange area a little deserted?

reply: 1. Feel the same. 2. Personal analysis of the main reasons is as follows: ·The methanol and downstream product exchange area itself is separated from the coal chemical industry section because * habit problem. After entering the forum, most members still * Get used to entering the coal chemical technology exchange area. ·For the same reason, some (my rough estimate is nearly 40%) posts related to methanol and downstream products are in the coal chemical industry section. ·It is difficult for ordinary people to determine whether some posts should be more appropriately included in the coal chemical industry or the methanol area. 3. Solution: ·Carry out special activities on methanol and downstream products. ·I have made suggestions many times to change the methanol and downstream products exchange area to the "Carbon-Chemical Technology Exchange Area". This will make the scope much wider, but the methanol and downstream products area will be narrower. ·As a compromise, this area was changed to the "Methanol and Carbon-Chemical Technology Exchange Area", which not only continued the original main content, but also expanded the scope. This post was last edited by zjyang168168 on 2008-1-18 20:35 ]

Agree with 2nd floor about some people* I am used to sending information and issues related to methanol to the coal chemical industry section. I wonder if this problem can be solved in this way.: 1. Set up a pinned post in the coal chemical industry section and explain where the methanol-related information should be uploaded to the forum. 2. The boss of the coal chemical industry section will take the initiative to send the relevant post to the methanol and its downstream products section.

If this section is renamed to Carbon Chemicals or something like that, the Coal Chemicals section will disagree, which will affect the postings in the Coal Chemicals section! As for the problem that some communication posts in this section are in other sections, the number needs to be further determined, and the scope needs to be reported to the administrator to further subdivide the scope of communication!

Agree with the opinions of the 3rd and 4th floors. Methanol is a very important and currently very hotly speculated chemical intermediate. The establishment of a separate exchange area for methanol and its downstream products provides a rare platform for everyone to understand and exchange relevant technical and economic information. I myself have benefited a lot from it time and time again. It is really inappropriate to put the relevant content in the coal chemical industry section in general. Coal chemical industry itself is broad and profound, including coal coking, coal gasification, coal liquefaction, etc., and there is a lot of content there.

I wonder if the production technology of butanoctanol falls under the category of "methanol and downstream products"? Many units did not follow the hot trend of methanol and used MTP or existing propylene and syngas resources to produce butyl octanol. They hoped to obtain some technical information on the forum. However, after posting several times, they basically disappeared, and the technical team and moderators did not respond. Although some friends I introduced came to see it with hope, there was no content that we paid attention to, so they left quietly. I believe that there are still many people paying attention to the production, market and construction of butanyl alcohol, because there are already 10 companies that have started or have put into production. If the moderator can pay attention to or organize resources in this area, there will definitely be new forces!

I agree with the views of the 2nd and 3rd floors. In order to improve the quality of discussions and the number of posts on this forum, some improvements should be made and the publicity of this forum should be strengthened. Even the simplest formaldehyde production has too few people participating in discussions and exchanges.

Some information about methanol is placed in the article section, which may not be appropriate. I think the article section should be things that cannot be included in other sections and belong to the chemical industry.

What has been said above is all valid, let me express my own point of view. The number of posts in the methanol section during this period is indeed much less than that of the previous period. The main reasons are analyzed as follows.: 1. There are far fewer help posts than before. Is it okay for everyone? Probably not. 2. Since the same IP cannot be rated by each other in the forum, most of the ratings here are done by moderators (you can know from the rating messages). Can the two moderators have so much time to read everyone's posts? 3. I personally agree with the opinions of the friends above that we should adopt corresponding incentive mechanisms to improve the atmosphere here. If something is wrong, please criticize me.

The rating of technical posts will be strengthened. Since version F and I have limited experience, we both have work to do. I hope that all members of the technical team and technical colleagues in the industry will actively join in the rating of the forum. Your participation is a strong backing for the development of this version. I hope that we can use our joint strength to develop this version!

In fact, the raw material for the production of methanol and its downstream products is basically coal. At present, these products are not dominant and have not reached the level of household name as the urea process. Some technical problems are still in the exploratory stage. Is it because the technical level needs to be improved to reduce the popularity? This requires everyone to communicate and interact more. Of course, the moderators and technical team members should increase rewards and encourage more people to participate in the discussion.

I agree with what was said on the third and fourth floors, methanol and downstream products should be in one partition. Regarding increasing popularity, my personal opinion is: 1. For posts posted to other forums, please ask the moderator to move them to this forum. 2. Are articles about methanol and downstream products also posted to this area? The articles I posted for the first time were moved to the article sharing area, and future articles will be posted directly there. I believe I'm not the only one with this situation. 3. It is recommended to provide incentives and hold some activities regularly. This post was last edited by sky28205065 on 2008-1-24 08:17 ]

Methanol is a very important and currently very hotly speculated chemical intermediate. A separate communication area for methanol and its downstream products has been set up for everyone to understand and exchange relevant technologies. Are articles about methanol and downstream products also posted to this area? The articles I posted for the first time were moved to the article sharing area, and future articles will be posted directly there. I believe I'm not the only one with this situation. Organize some activities regularly. Ratings will be strengthened for technical posts, and we hope to use everyone’s joint strength to develop this edition.:handshake

Polyol products should be regarded as the downstream of methanol. As for the phenomenon of no response from friends on the 6th floor, it should be said that the reasons are more complicated. The other two moderators and I will increase the rating of this area and do our best to enliven the atmosphere and mobilize everyone's enthusiasm! I will report the name change proposal to the Haichuan administrator and look forward to further discussion and decision! ! ! Thank you all for your support. If you have any suggestions or comments, please contact me! ! This post was last edited by ft2489244 on 2008-3-5 08:59 ]