Want to ask about the feeling of getting a low score and the settings?
Thread Content
I just got promoted, and I noticed that it’s now possible to give negative scores. But how to evaluate it, what criteria to use – there are concerns about whether some things can be overlooked. During patrols, it’s common to find some posts that are problematic; generally, I send a text message to inform either the poster or the moderator so that the post can be deleted or moved. Especially posts made by newcomers or those who have been online for a short time are particularly difficult to respond to. After all, it’s not easy for newcomers to earn wealth, and they are not familiar with the rules of the group, so sometimes they post some nonsense (or similar posts). Since Hai Chuan has granted me this right, it’s very difficult to exercise it. I wonder how the seniors handled it
Overall, managers are quite cautious when exercising their power to deduct points. 1. For first-time offenses or minor violations, a text message warning or moving the post to the trash can is usually sufficient ； 2. For those who engage in verbal attacks or repeat violations, their posts are usually deleted directly or their accounts are banned (in such cases, deducting points is useless, as the points are removed once the post is deleted) ； 3. For cases of excessive mutual rating within the same IP, deducting points is a means to address it. Take a look at the Coke example: http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-144846-1-1.html This post was last edited by Bincheng Watcher on 2008-1-23 11:46.]
Management should be guided by generosity, according to the cleaner； Personally, I think you should take action when the time comes: one warning, then a point deduction, and on the third occasion... . .
It’s very difficult; I have to spend ages explaining things to them and asking them to make corrections, and then wait for them to do so. Only when they keep refusing to change do I feel forced to deduct points from them, just like dealing with a young wife, haha.
The thing to fear is taking things seriously! It’s not about how difficult it is to post properly; rather, it’s the case that some people are too lazy to take the time to familiarize themselves with the rules of the forum and its functions. Such people generally have a speculative mindset, acting in their own interest, as can be seen from the huge difference between the number of registered users on the forum and the actual number of posts made. The fundamental purpose of requiring standardized posting is to enable everyone to make use of the materials more effectively, with management needs being a secondary consideration. As a highly professional technical forum, its registrants should possess a certain level of educational background and computer skills. The convenience of a few individuals should not lead to chaos in the forum’s materials, thereby threatening its long-term development. I believe everyone understands what this means. This post was last edited by fushan on 2008-1-25 17:27.]
If a duplicate post from 2008 is found, points may be deducted at the discretion of the moderators within a range of -20 points.
It’s very difficult. I just deleted a few replies – posts mixed in with technical discussions and threads containing attachments – and I already got a report saying that this was too strict! Not to mention giving negative scores; it’s recommended that the rules state that “if duplicate posts from 2008 are found, points can be deducted at the discretion of the moderators, up to -20 points.” It’s also suggested that pure information manuals should not allow posting; any materials that can be downloaded successfully should be locked away, and there’s no need for posts like ‘thanks’ afterwards – a simple expression of gratitude is sufficient. This ensures that posts meet the required standards and improves the quality of the forum, as well as helping to conserve resources