HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

[Solved and can be closed] Issues regarding the design of the supports

2008-01-23View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by Lin Xuefeng on 2013-7-5 09:00. For devices that are not too tall (with a height of less than 5 meters), when designing the supports, it is necessary to decide whether to use channel steel or pipes as supports. Which option is better? Could someone with more experience provide a detailed explanation? lol
Reply #22008-01-23
It depends on the diameter of the device as well as its load conditions, primarily the weight load; only by performing calculations can appropriate support components be selected.
Reply #32008-01-23
Thank you. I mainly want to know, within the range permitted by the load constraints (since devices with high loads or high heights may require grouped seating), which type of support – one designed using channel steel or one designed using thick-walled pipes – has better strength. Do each of them have their own appropriate application areas? :handshake
Reply #42008-01-23
Bro, are you talking about angle steel? I prefer to use angle steel – it fits well with the cylinder, making welding and assembly easier. The legs have the same inertial radius in all directions, which provides good stability against collapse.
Reply #52008-11-06
I would like to ask under what circumstances 3 supports are used and under what circumstances 4 supports are used. Please advise, experts
Reply #62008-11-06
This is mainly related to the diameter and the weight of the device itself; generally, for devices with a smaller diameter, three are sufficient.
Reply #72008-11-06
Personally, I think it is better to use thick-walled pipes for withstanding loads, as steel pipes have better bending resistance than channel steel
Reply #82008-11-06
The standards are fairly clear; if the load is too large, the standard methods cannot be used, so custom solutions are required, with calculations done on one’s own
Reply #92008-11-07
Replying to #1: In my opinion (for equipment with a total height of 5000 mm or less, and leg heights of 1500 mm or less), both channel steel and round tubes can be used as legs; it depends on which is more convenient. Channel steel and angle steel are easier to weld to the cylinder, while round tubes require an arc-shaped groove to be created in order to be welded to the cylinder; Using round tubes results in greater solidity and better stability; it is recommended to use round tubes when the legs need to be relatively tall

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.