HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Could everyone provide a few examples of intellectual property disputes? (The gasification industry is the best)

2008-02-01View Original

Thread Content

I’m writing something for a foreign company, and they asked for some examples; I really can’t find any suitable ones. Can those who know it help give some hints? Thank you! ! ! !
Reply #22008-02-01
Actually, I know a few myself, but I’m not aware of the full details. For example, did Guotai Acetic Acid have some dispute with some company in the United States? Who can help with the specific details? Anything similar will work
Reply #32008-02-02
In fact, the purpose of technical property rights is to promote technological progress. However, in China, the issue of intellectual property rights has been deliberately distorted by foreign companies. The person upstairs mentioned the example of Cathay Pacific; actually, BP’s patents should have entered the Chinese market back in 1986. If those patents were applied for at that time, they should have expired by now. These companies are well aware of this, and they bring up such issues in order to slow down the technological progress of domestic enterprises and maximize their economic interests in China. (A 15-year protection period should have expired long ago.) If intellectual property rights are always used as an excuse, then what’s the point of China introducing such technologies? What’s the point of protecting intellectual property rights? The same is true with GE’s gasification patents – the company transferred its gasification technology to southern Shandong in 1985, and more than 20 years have passed since then, yet they still use these patents to threaten domestic enterprises; it’s pure technological extortion!!!!
Reply #42008-02-02
What was said upstairs makes sense – repeating introductions each time wastes a lot of money; some of those items are already past their protection period yet still need to be introduced. Some domestic design firms and relevant agencies also play a negative role, which is truly sad
Reply #52008-02-18
Thank you for your answer. I need to keep looking
Reply #62008-02-20
The patent dispute over the ash fusion gasification technology between the Shanxi Coal Chemistry Research Institute and Shaanxi Qinjin Company was covered in detail by China Science and Technology News; the original poster is encouraged to read it.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.