Thoughts triggered by the rating of a help post
Thread Content
Recently, I saw a help-seeking post like "I have a CAD drawing" in the CAD area. Many problems with scoring appeared in it. I have to mention it and it is worth thinking about. Thoughts 1. I don’t understand why a post asking for help can be rated. What is the purpose of rating? Is it normal to rate the person who asks for help but not the person who helps? Not only do ordinary members do this, but a member of the technical team also does this. Doesn't it set a bad example? Thought 2: After checking the information of several people who rated on the first floor, I realized that these three members are from the same IP. They are either done by one person or from the same organization. No wonder, but the forum clearly states that the same IP cannot be rated for any reason, but they still do it. Obviously, they do not take the forum rules into consideration. Continuing to check the posts of the three, I found more mutual ratings, many of which were also ratings of the help-seeking posts. The three people have the same IP and have a lot of ratings for each other, which is a very obvious method of speculation. Thought 3. Thinking about the guidance and limitations of grading. Thinking and discussing grading is not a new thing. However, we have to think about it further. First of all, we see that the enthusiasm and initiative of forum members for grading are still not enough. Ordinary members don’t have many ratings and are not very proactive. (Personally, I think this is a common problem. It has nothing to do with you, and you hang it up high. It is not good for you anyway, and the points you give do not go into your own pocket. What would be the result if 1/4 of the ratings are returned to the rating members. . . ) In contrast, irregular ratings occur very frequently, including various issues, equal sharing and speculation, mainly among ordinary members and members of the technical team. If this phenomenon occurs in large numbers, it will have a very negative impact on the forum and is not conducive to the prosperity and development of the forum. Therefore, it is a very important issue to establish a complete mechanism to provide necessary guidance and restrictions on this issue. Thought 4: How to guide and limit scoring? On the one hand, we should develop and improve the scoring mechanism, such as restricting unreasonable scoring, such as limiting the scoring of help posts, etc. On the other hand, if there is a system, it must be handled strictly, dealt with immediately when found, and reported regularly so that members can consciously pay attention to and comply with it. There is also the need to provide guidance and encourage members to make more reasonable ratings, participate in more forum discussions, actively participate in the construction of the forum, increase their awareness of initiative, and truly regard the forum as their other "home". Thought 5. Suggestions for new members of the forum, whether you are a new technical team member of the forum or a new practical * Moderators, you must pay attention to your own behavior, because you represent the image of the forum, and your behavior will set an example for the forum. Whether it is good or bad, it goes without saying that it is good. If you become a bad example, you will be unanimously criticized by members. Must keep learning * and progress, grew up as soon as possible, and became a qualified engineer and moderator of the forum. My experience is that we need to keep learning * Learn again * , Only in this way can we keep up with the development of the forum. Otherwise, we will retreat if we don’t advance. I'm sorry for being so long-winded, but good medicine tastes bitter. The reason why I didn't delete and deal with this post is mainly because I want to leave it as a warning and attract everyone's attention. This post was last edited by white36 on 2008-2-1 20:36 ]
As a help post poster, you can get ratings, and some of them are commented by members of the technical team. Some of the reasons are that initiating an issue will only encourage a little bit of technical content. I have talked about this problem before. http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-149665-1-1.html
The phenomena of rating each other and speculating on points frequently occur, and the moderators are helpless against the vests. I remember the "Bincheng Watcher" once said, "As long as they don't affect the order of the forum, it's fine." This sentence may be helpless. Here I have a little suggestion: Organize super-editors to form a rating monitoring team to regularly check the rating status in the forum and stop the evil deeds of these vests.
These completely need to be resolved by the moderators and super-editors. Firstly, they have the authority to handle it. Secondly, they can check the IP and other information. Of course, our technical staff can give feedback based on the appearance.
The author's comments are very profound. There are a few individual forum members who join Haichuan just for the purpose of asking for money. They never thought of a little contribution. Others have given so much, so why are they not willing to give a little bit of their own experience and energy? I am for everyone and everyone is for me. We hope to find a better solution mechanism with everyone's joint efforts.
You can't beat him to death with a stick. . . I also commented on the help post. . That’s because I feel that the problem of asking for help is very profound. . Triggered personal thinking. . . , In addition, although some posters of help-seeking posts classify themselves as help-seeking posts, in terms of content, they are much more meaningful than some so-called discussion posts. . . On the other hand, there are some so-called discussion posts. . Many of them are just one question. . It doesn't make any sense. . Some are obviously simply requests for information. . According to the landlord's wishes. . Are these ready for scoring? . According to the landlord's wishes. . . I just put the help posts in other categories. . Can it be rated? . . In fact, there should be three possibilities for this kind of event. . 1. Fry points. . . 2. Problems with the scorers themselves should be severely cracked down on. . Can't tell. . . for this. . If you are a member of the technical team. . . Then record it in the record first. 3. The help post does have a certain depth and meaning, or. . The questions asked triggered in-depth thinking by the raters and provided certain reminders for them to solve certain problems in certain fields. . . At least I will rate the help posts like this. . . Recognize its value. . I also want to thank him for the tips he gave me. .