Thread Content
1. Pair N structure: One pair of transmission lines and N instruments, with multiple signals transmitted in both directions; this simplifies wiring, shortens the project timeline, reduces installation costs, and makes wiring easier. If additional field equipment or instruments are added, they can be connected in parallel to the cable without the need to install new cables. 2. High reliability: Digital signal transmission has strong resistance to interference and high precision; there is no need for measures to counter interference or improve precision, thereby reducing costs. 3. Controllable state: In the control room, the operator can monitor the operating status of on-site equipment or instruments, adjust their parameters, and predict or identify faults. The system remains under the operator’s remote supervision and control, thereby enhancing its reliability, controllability, and maintainability. 4. Interchangeability: Users can freely choose the field devices or instruments with the best performance-to-price ratio offered by different manufacturers, and interconnect instruments of various brands. Even if a gauge fails, replacing it with a similar gauge from another brand will allow it to function normally, achieving \"ready-to-use\" functionality. 5. Interoperability: Users can integrate instruments of various brands from different manufacturers and configure them uniformly to create the control loops they need. Users need not rack their brains, nor spend effort or make additional investments in hardware or software to integrate products from different brands. 6. Comprehensive functions: On-site instruments possess functions of detection, conversion, and compensation, as well as control and calculation. Enabling multiple uses of a single table not only facilitates users but also saves costs. 7. Distributed control: The control functions are distributed among the field instruments, and control loops can be established using these instruments, thereby achieving true distributed control and enhancing the system’s reliability, autonomy, and flexibility. 8. Unified configuration: Since the concept of function blocks is applied to field devices and instruments, all manufacturers use the same function blocks and adopt a unified configuration method. This makes configuration very simple; users do not need to undergo training or learn configuration methods and programming languages due to the differences in types of field devices or instruments. 9. Open system: The fieldbus is an open interconnection network; all technologies and standards are public, and all manufacturers must comply with them. This allows users to freely integrate communication networks from different manufacturers, enabling interconnection not only with networks at the same layer but also with those at different layers ; Additionally, users can share databases extremely conveniently. In recent years, fieldbus standards and their technologies have increasingly become a focus of attention in the field of international automatic control; some even predict that the 21st century will be the century of fieldbuses. This is because: fieldbus standards will usher in a new era for process control ; Fieldbuses will bring about a fundamental transformation in the structure of traditional control systems ; The decisions made regarding fieldbuses at present will influence the field of control for decades to come ; Fieldbuses will **change all the existing methods for implementing control and maintenance ; For the industrial sector, the greatest advantage of using fieldbuses is that it **allows for savings in connection wires, as well as in maintenance and installation costs. At the same time, fieldbuses can transmit multiple process variables. Traditional 4mA~20mA control loops can generally carry only one signal, usually a process variable. With the use of fieldbuses, while transmitting process variables, the instrument identifiers and basic diagnostic information can also be sent along. The precision of digital signals is another advantage of field buses; digital signals have higher resolution than 4mA–20mA analog signals, thus eliminating the errors that used to occur during analog-to-digital conversion. Remote maintenance will also become possible with the use of digital communication and intelligent field instruments. Since fieldbuses are bidirectional, it is possible to calibrate, adjust, and perform operational diagnostics on field smart instruments from the central control room; it is even possible to predict failures before they occur. An even more important aspect is that the compatibility of these instruments benefits the users.
1. Pair N structure: One pair of transmission lines and N instruments, with multiple signals transmitted in both directions; this simplifies wiring, shortens the project timeline, reduces installation costs, and makes wiring easier. If additional field equipment or instruments are added, they can be connected in parallel to the cable without the need to install new cables. Answer: The project timeline was shortened, but the cost increased. The devices corresponding to the FF bus are much more expensive. When adding metering devices, it is also necessary to ensure that the network segment has a bandwidth of no more than 1900 M and a voltage of not less than 9 volts. 2. High reliability: Digital signal transmission has strong resistance to interference and high precision; there is no need for measures to counter interference or improve precision, thereby reducing costs. Answer: Digital signals need to be carefully protected from water intrusion and lightning strikes. 3. Controllable status: The operator in the control room can monitor the operating condition of the equipment or instruments on site, adjust their parameters, and predict or identify faults; everything remains under the operator’s remote monitoring and control, thereby enhancing the reliability, controllability, and maintainability of the system. Answer: Software support is required, such as AMS, PRM, etc. HART instruments are used in the same way. 4. Interchangeability: Users can freely choose the field devices or instruments with the best performance-to-price ratio offered by different manufacturers, and interconnect instruments of various brands. Even if a gauge fails, replacing it with a similar gauge from another brand will allow it to function normally, achieving \"ready-to-use\" functionality. Answer: Any instrument with a fieldbus can be read from and written to on the DCS. Instruments with the HART protocol can also be used immediately. 5. Interoperability: Users can integrate instruments of various brands from different manufacturers and configure them uniformly to create the control loops they need. Users need not rack their brains, nor spend effort or make additional investments in hardware or software to integrate products from different brands. Answer: This item doesn’t have much effect. A DCS that is not based on a bus is also acceptable. 6. Comprehensive functions: Field instruments possess functions for detection, conversion, and compensation, as well as control and calculation capabilities. Enabling multiple uses of a single table not only facilitates users but also saves costs. Answer: The bus functionality is powerful, but its utilization rate is low, resulting in **increased costs**. 7. Distributed control: The control functions are distributed among the field instruments, and control loops can be established using these instruments, thereby achieving true distributed control and enhancing the system’s reliability, autonomy, and flexibility. Answer: Control is delegated to the field; if the DCS fails, control can still be carried out manually, but this is used in ordinary circuits. If the instruments on the two network segments are connected to each other, and the DCS fails, nothing can be controlled. 8. Unified configuration: Since the concept of function blocks is used for field devices and instruments, all manufacturers employ the same function blocks as well as a unified configuration method. This makes configuration very simple; users do not need to undergo training or learn configuration methods and programming languages due to the differences in types of field devices or instruments. Answer: The existence of both EDDL and FDT modes boils down to the fact that everyone wants to be in charge. 9. Open system: The fieldbus is an open interconnection network; all technologies and standards are public, and all manufacturers must comply with them. This allows users to freely integrate communication networks from different manufacturers, enabling interconnection not only with networks at the same layer but also with those at different layers ; Additionally, users can share databases extremely conveniently. Reply: It’s not easy to achieve true openness; I hope for a seamless connection. Overall, those who can afford it use fieldbuses at present; most still use HART instruments. However, technology is advancing, and it is believed that in the near future buses will surely be used in every corner of factories. The above are just my humble opinions; feel free to challenge me!
The reviews for Huangseagull are indeed very good; however, fieldbus is a trend that will emerge once the cost and technical issues are resolved.
Fieldbuses are most widely used in our country; Sikeo has over 10,000 FF meters. It is Emerson’s largest global user.
In the short term, fieldbuses cannot overcome DCS; DCS is still widely used in domestic projects. As for the reasons, the analysis on page three is very thorough!
CNOOC’s 600,000-ton-per-year methanol production uses FF; the cost is higher than that of DCS, but the level of control achieved is still good!