HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

How should “new energy” be translated appropriately?

2008-02-14View Original

Thread Content

Question: New Energy can be translated as either “New Energy” or “New Energy Source”. Which one is more appropriate? This post was last edited by Bincheng Watcher on 2008-3-1 20:28]
Reply #22008-02-14
I think it’s better to translate it as the latter
Reply #32008-02-14
\"New Energy Source\" is more commonly used; without \"Source\", it focuses mainly on energy, such as Nuclear energy, etc.
Reply #42008-02-14
New energy sources are better.
Reply #52008-02-18
www.newenergy.org.cn and www.new-energy.cn are two major domestic websites, but both use “new energy” in their domain names
Reply #62008-03-12
One of our company’s foreign subsidiaries has recently established a new department, called the New Energy Dept. After all, the word \"energy\" itself already means energy – so why is it necessary to add the word \"source\" as well?
Reply #72008-03-22
New in Chinese sometimes refers to something different from the traditional. All alternative energies are the best.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.