Which guidelines are used as the basis for preparing a feasibility study report?

Boss, you’re the one who writes it – why worry about such things? Just follow the guidelines you’ve set; that’s what’s correct. It’s all just stuff companies use to deceive people; as long as you put your signature on it, that’s enough. However, Document No. 76 issued by Sinopec provides more information for ** to review, and it is not as simple as that issued by the Ministry of Chemical Industry

If it is a petrochemical project or a project carried out by a subsidiary of Sinopec, there is no doubt that it must follow Sinopec’s guidelines, as the feasibility study needs to be approved by them. For projects that are not petrochemical projects (that is, chemical projects that do not use crude oil, natural gas, and their derivatives as raw materials), such as certain fine chemical or biochemical projects, the \"Provisions on the Content and Depth of Feasibility Study Reports for Chemical Construction Projects\" (Ministry of Chemical Industry Document No. 426 [1997]) can be applied. For reference. :)

I was just about to prepare a report; now it’s clear. Thank you to the original poster and those who commented on posts 2 and 3

Regarding your question, LZ, I consulted an expert from my company just now, and the answers are as follows: 1. Generally, Sinopec’s standards are used for companies under Sinopec for documentation purposes； 2. For some private enterprises or entities that are not part of Sinopec, the \"Regulations on the Content and Depth of Feasibility Study Reports for Chemical Industry Construction Projects\" issued by the former Ministry of Chemical Industry in 1997, in its revised version No. 426, is generally used (this is the version currently in use by our organization) ； 3. Of course, it also depends on the requirements of the property owner or the project manager of the unit, etc. This post was last edited by nobelguo on 2008-2-15 11:19]

I didn’t find it that troublesome. Our project is in the chemical industry, so we just need to write it ourselves; what’s important is that section, and if there’s the official seal of the design company, then everything is fine. It seems like the original poster is unnecessarily complicating things.

Feasibility reports have become less useful in China; they don’t hold much value as a reference. All that matters is to get the project approved so that the funds can be obtained.

1) The “**** Plant Construction Project Design Contract” signed between **** Co., Ltd. and **** Co., Ltd. 2) “Regulations on the Preparation of Feasibility Study Reports for Oil Refining and Chemical Engineering Projects” (Petroleum Planning Document No. 234). 3) Information provided by **** Co., Ltd. The above is for reference only; it should be determined based on the specific nature of the project.

Feasibility study: It’s mainly for internal review within the factory; no one cares whether it’s done well or not. Sometimes it’s also used for **filing purposes**. Project application report: This is submitted to the relevant authorities as part of the application to initiate a project; it needs to be prepared carefully. If not done properly, well… hehe! Go check the **NDRC website.

Sinopec follows the \"Methods for Preparing Feasibility Study Reports for Chemical Industry Investment Projects\" (Sinopec Association for Industrial Development Document No. 76, 2006) when preparing such reports; I also prepared mine in accordance with these guidelines

For the financial evaluation section, we mainly refer to \"Methods and Parameters for Economic Evaluation of Construction Projects\" (3rd edition), published by China Planning Press. Other contents will be adjusted according to the actual situation of the project.

I was on a business trip these past few days and have just returned. Thank you all for your participation, and I’m especially grateful to wsts00100 for taking the time to provide feedback

Without a doubt, Sinopec has its own regulations regarding staffing, and PetroChina has its own regulations as well; the regulations of these two companies are sufficient, and they are more comprehensive than those of other companies, so they can’t go wrong. :lol

Thank you, it’s very useful. I exactly need it, and thanks to everyone upstairs for the detailed explanations

Studying*. . . . . . . . . . .

We previously used the \"Regulations on the Content and Depth of Feasibility Study Reports for Chemical Engineering Construction Projects\" (Document No. 426 [1997] issued by the Ministry of Chemical Industry). Later, upon notification from the China Petroleum and Chemical Industry Survey and Design Association, the \"Methods for Preparing Feasibility Study Reports for Chemical Engineering Investment Projects\" 【Document No. 76 [2006] issued by the China Petroleum and Chemical Industry Survey and Design Association】 came into use starting in 2007; this document also includes funding application reports and project application reports, whereas for ordinary projects only a feasibility study report is required. In other words, the latter replaced the former. Sinopec projects are still prepared in accordance with Document Sinopec Zi (2005) No. 154, the \"Regulations on the Preparation of Feasibility Study Reports for Petrochemical Projects\", and this document is available on the forum.

Has anyone compared the differences in content and depth between the \"Regulations on the Content and Depth of Feasibility Study Reports for Chemical Engineering Construction Projects\" (Ministry of Chemical Industry Document No. 426 [1997]) and the \"Methods for Preparing Feasibility Study Reports for Chemical Engineering Investment Projects\" [Sinopec Association Document No. 76 [2006]]? Please summarize it

Methods for Preparing Feasibility Study Reports for Chemical Industry Investment Projects, SINOPEC Association for Industrial Development (2006) No. 76, Preface, P5: “...In light of institutional changes and market demands, and in accordance with the latest relevant policies and industry technological advancements, the provisions of the original documents have been comprehensively revised.” The previous four “Content Deep Dives” have been merged into the “Guidelines for Preparing Feasibility Study Reports for Chemical Industry Investment Projects”…”. For details, see the post at http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-1094617-1-1.html